OSCG vs. DRLL
OSCG (Leverage Shares 2X Long OSCR Daily ETF) and DRLL (Strive U.S. Energy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - OSCG is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Leverage Shares, while DRLL is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Bloomberg US Energy Select Index. OSCG is actively managed, while DRLL is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. OSCG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.41%/yr for DRLL.
Performance
OSCG vs. DRLL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OSCG achieves a 200.83% return, which is significantly higher than DRLL's 31.20% return.
OSCG
- 1D
- 1.55%
- 1M
- 2.10%
- 6M
- 132.59%
- YTD
- 200.83%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DRLL
- 1D
- 1.79%
- 1M
- 8.27%
- 6M
- 24.28%
- YTD
- 31.20%
- 1Y
- 35.68%
- 3Y*
- 13.19%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OSCG vs. DRLL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
OSCG Leverage Shares 2X Long OSCR Daily ETF | 200.83% | -39.92% |
DRLL Strive U.S. Energy ETF | 31.20% | 2.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between OSCG and DRLL is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2025 | -0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OSCG vs. DRLL — Risk / Return Rank
OSCG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
DRLL
OSCG vs. DRLL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long OSCR Daily ETF (OSCG) and Strive U.S. Energy ETF (DRLL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| OSCG | DRLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.26 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.11 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 5.40 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
OSCG vs. DRLL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OSCG drawdown since its inception was -71.31%, which is greater than DRLL's maximum drawdown of -23.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OSCG and DRLL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OSCG | DRLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.31% | -23.73% | -47.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -16.99% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -23.73% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.03% | -8.14% | -10.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.66% | -8.17% | -23.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 6.63% | — |
Volatility
OSCG vs. DRLL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OSCG | DRLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.53% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 18.47% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 145.15% | 22.81% | +122.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 145.15% | 23.81% | +121.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 145.15% | 23.81% | +121.34% |
OSCG vs. DRLL - Expense Ratio Comparison
OSCG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than DRLL's 0.41% expense ratio.
Dividends
OSCG vs. DRLL - Dividend Comparison
OSCG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DRLL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.31%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRLL Strive U.S. Energy ETF | 2.31% | 2.99% | 3.00% | 3.01% | 1.18% |
OSCG Leverage Shares 2X Long OSCR Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OSCG and DRLL have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DRLL is cheaper at 0.41% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DRLL is cheaper with a 0.41% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for OSCG.
DRLL has the higher dividend yield at 2.31%, compared with 0.00% for OSCG.
OSCG is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while DRLL is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Strive. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for OSCG and 0.41% for DRLL.
Find the right allocation for OSCG and DRLL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer