OSCG vs. DBO
OSCG (Leverage Shares 2X Long OSCR Daily ETF) and DBO (Invesco DB Oil Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - OSCG is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Leverage Shares, while DBO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil Index Excess Return. OSCG is actively managed, while DBO is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.00, they often move in opposite directions. OSCG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for DBO.
Performance
OSCG vs. DBO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OSCG achieves a 200.83% return, which is significantly higher than DBO's 68.61% return.
OSCG
- 1D
- 1.55%
- 1M
- 2.10%
- 6M
- 132.59%
- YTD
- 200.83%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DBO
- 1D
- 3.73%
- 1M
- 9.47%
- 6M
- 62.48%
- YTD
- 68.61%
- 1Y
- 54.48%
- 3Y*
- 15.79%
- 5Y*
- 13.08%
- 10Y*
- 10.77%
OSCG vs. DBO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
OSCG Leverage Shares 2X Long OSCR Daily ETF | 200.83% | -39.92% |
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund | 68.61% | -3.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between OSCG and DBO is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2025 | -0.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OSCG vs. DBO — Risk / Return Rank
OSCG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
DBO
OSCG vs. DBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long OSCR Daily ETF (OSCG) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| OSCG | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.26 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.97 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 5.27 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
OSCG vs. DBO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OSCG drawdown since its inception was -71.31%, smaller than the maximum DBO drawdown of -90.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OSCG and DBO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OSCG | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.31% | -90.18% | +18.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -27.73% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -28.20% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -37.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -61.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.03% | -55.63% | +36.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.66% | -62.21% | +30.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 10.37% | — |
Volatility
OSCG vs. DBO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OSCG | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 13.53% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 31.28% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 145.15% | 36.22% | +108.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 145.15% | 32.96% | +112.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 145.15% | 31.93% | +113.22% |
OSCG vs. DBO - Expense Ratio Comparison
OSCG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than DBO's 0.78% expense ratio.
Dividends
OSCG vs. DBO - Dividend Comparison
OSCG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DBO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.08%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund | 2.08% | 3.51% | 4.68% | 4.59% | 0.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.63% | 1.58% |
OSCG Leverage Shares 2X Long OSCR Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OSCG and DBO have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, OSCG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
OSCG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBO.
DBO has the higher dividend yield at 2.08%, compared with 0.00% for OSCG.
OSCG is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while DBO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for OSCG and 0.78% for DBO.
Find the right allocation for OSCG and DBO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer