PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ORR vs. FTLS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ORR vs. FTLS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Militia Long/Short Equity ETF (ORR) and First Trust Long/Short Equity ETF (FTLS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with ORR having a 5.30% return and FTLS slightly lower at 5.21%.


ORR

1D
1.24%
1M
0.62%
YTD
5.30%
6M
8.24%
1Y
26.34%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FTLS

1D
0.67%
1M
1.31%
YTD
5.21%
6M
4.51%
1Y
14.78%
3Y*
14.27%
5Y*
10.33%
10Y*
9.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ORR vs. FTLS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
ORR
Militia Long/Short Equity ETF
5.30%32.15%
FTLS
First Trust Long/Short Equity ETF
5.21%7.15%

Correlation

The correlation between ORR and FTLS is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 16, 2025

0.36

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ORR vs. FTLS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ORR
ORR Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
ORR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ORR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
ORR Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
ORR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
ORR Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

FTLS
FTLS Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
FTLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTLS Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
FTLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTLS Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ORR vs. FTLS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Militia Long/Short Equity ETF (ORR) and First Trust Long/Short Equity ETF (FTLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ORRFTLSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.96

1.81

+0.15

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.74

2.64

+0.10

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.33

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.84

3.96

-1.12

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.76

12.34

-4.58

ORR vs. FTLS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ORR Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is comparable to the FTLS Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ORR and FTLS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ORRFTLSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.96

1.81

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.78

0.81

+0.97

Drawdowns

ORR vs. FTLS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ORR drawdown since its inception was -9.85%, smaller than the maximum FTLS drawdown of -20.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ORR and FTLS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ORRFTLSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.85%

-20.54%

+10.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.85%

-3.79%

-6.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.96%

-0.15%

-7.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.16%

-2.69%

+0.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.61%

1.21%

+2.40%

Volatility

ORR vs. FTLS - Volatility Comparison

Militia Long/Short Equity ETF (ORR) has a higher volatility of 4.02% compared to First Trust Long/Short Equity ETF (FTLS) at 1.93%. This indicates that ORR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTLS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ORRFTLSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.02%

1.93%

+2.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.90%

5.65%

+5.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.55%

8.19%

+5.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.34%

10.55%

+4.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.34%

11.30%

+4.04%

ORR vs. FTLS - Expense Ratio Comparison

ORR has a 14.19% expense ratio, which is higher than FTLS's 1.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

ORR vs. FTLS - Dividend Comparison

ORR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FTLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTLS
First Trust Long/Short Equity ETF
0.90%1.07%1.50%1.49%0.81%0.01%0.44%0.83%0.87%0.43%1.04%0.49%
ORR
Militia Long/Short Equity ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ORR and FTLS have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ORR has higher volatility (4.02%) compared to FTLS (1.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ORR dropped -9.85% vs FTLS's -20.54%.

On 1-year performance, ORR leads with 26.34% vs 14.78% for FTLS. On fees, FTLS is cheaper at 1.60% per year. On volatility, FTLS has been the lower-risk option at 1.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, ORR has performed better with a 26.34% return vs 14.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FTLS is cheaper with a 1.60% expense ratio, compared with 14.19% for ORR.

FTLS has the higher dividend yield at 0.90%, compared with 0.00% for ORR.

They also come from different issuers: Militia Investments and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 14.19% for ORR and 1.60% for FTLS.

ORR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ORR and FTLS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer