PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ORNAX vs. NMZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ORNAX vs. NMZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Rochester Municipal Opportunities Fund (ORNAX) and Nuveen Municipal High Income Opportunity Fund (NMZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ORNAX achieves a 1.68% return, which is significantly lower than NMZ's 3.29% return. Over the past 10 years, ORNAX has outperformed NMZ with an annualized return of 4.15%, while NMZ has yielded a comparatively lower 2.64% annualized return.


ORNAX

1D
0.30%
1M
1.07%
YTD
1.68%
6M
1.99%
1Y
5.81%
3Y*
3.96%
5Y*
0.39%
10Y*
4.15%

NMZ

1D
-0.39%
1M
2.14%
YTD
3.29%
6M
-0.08%
1Y
6.47%
3Y*
5.96%
5Y*
-1.54%
10Y*
2.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ORNAX vs. NMZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ORNAX
Invesco Rochester Municipal Opportunities Fund
1.68%2.32%4.76%7.66%-14.80%6.73%5.89%14.25%9.16%6.88%
NMZ
Nuveen Municipal High Income Opportunity Fund
3.29%1.56%16.52%0.69%-27.36%10.41%7.33%28.36%-9.47%12.87%

Correlation

The correlation between ORNAX and NMZ is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2003

0.23

The correlation between ORNAX and NMZ shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (all time) to 0.44 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ORNAX vs. NMZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ORNAX
ORNAX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
ORNAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ORNAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
ORNAX Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
ORNAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
ORNAX Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

NMZ
NMZ Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
NMZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NMZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
NMZ Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
NMZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
NMZ Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ORNAX vs. NMZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Rochester Municipal Opportunities Fund (ORNAX) and Nuveen Municipal High Income Opportunity Fund (NMZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ORNAXNMZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.94

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.13

+0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.21

1.09

+1.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.30

2.76

+3.54

ORNAX vs. NMZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ORNAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is higher than the NMZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ORNAX and NMZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ORNAXNMZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.63

0.69

+0.94

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

-0.12

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

0.18

+0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.78

0.27

+0.52

Drawdowns

ORNAX vs. NMZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ORNAX drawdown since its inception was -55.48%, smaller than the maximum NMZ drawdown of -58.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ORNAX and NMZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ORNAXNMZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.48%

-58.53%

+3.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.92%

-5.94%

+3.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.79%

-21.56%

+11.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.16%

-40.03%

+18.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.16%

-40.03%

+18.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.03%

-12.28%

+12.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.07%

-9.47%

+2.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.06%

2.35%

-1.29%

Volatility

ORNAX vs. NMZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Rochester Municipal Opportunities Fund (ORNAX) is 1.31%, while Nuveen Municipal High Income Opportunity Fund (NMZ) has a volatility of 2.84%. This indicates that ORNAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NMZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ORNAXNMZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.31%

2.84%

-1.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.65%

7.28%

-4.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.98%

9.40%

-5.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.04%

12.94%

-6.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.01%

14.76%

-8.75%

ORNAX vs. NMZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

ORNAX has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is lower than NMZ's 1.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

ORNAX vs. NMZ - Dividend Comparison

ORNAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.59%, less than NMZ's 7.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NMZ
Nuveen Municipal High Income Opportunity Fund
7.71%7.71%6.35%5.44%7.04%5.10%5.09%4.99%6.15%5.94%6.94%6.67%
ORNAX
Invesco Rochester Municipal Opportunities Fund
3.59%5.86%5.68%4.21%4.04%4.26%4.86%4.50%4.80%5.78%6.50%6.67%

Frequently Asked Questions


ORNAX and NMZ have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NMZ has higher volatility (2.84%) compared to ORNAX (1.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ORNAX dropped -55.48% vs NMZ's -58.53%.

ORNAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs 0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ORNAX and NMZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer