PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ORNAX vs. FHTFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ORNAX vs. FHTFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Rochester Municipal Opportunities Fund (ORNAX) and Federated Hermes Municipal High Yield Advtg Fd (FHTFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ORNAX achieves a 0.44% return, which is significantly lower than FHTFX's 1.23% return. Over the past 10 years, ORNAX has outperformed FHTFX with an annualized return of 3.65%, while FHTFX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.24% annualized return.


ORNAX

1D
0.00%
1M
-2.40%
6M
0.28%
YTD
0.44%
1Y
4.85%
3Y*
3.90%
5Y*
-0.19%
10Y*
3.65%
ALL TIME*
4.32%

FHTFX

1D
0.00%
1M
-1.76%
6M
0.38%
YTD
1.23%
1Y
6.70%
3Y*
4.48%
5Y*
0.23%
10Y*
2.24%
ALL TIME*
3.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

ORNAX vs. FHTFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ORNAX
Invesco Rochester Municipal Opportunities Fund
0.44%2.32%4.76%7.66%-14.80%6.73%5.89%14.25%9.16%6.88%
FHTFX
Federated Hermes Municipal High Yield Advtg Fd
1.23%2.09%5.67%6.91%-13.36%5.47%2.91%9.76%0.76%7.48%

Correlation

The correlation between ORNAX and FHTFX is 0.73, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 1993

0.70

The correlation between ORNAX and FHTFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (all time) to 0.84 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ORNAX vs. FHTFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ORNAX
ORNAX Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
ORNAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ORNAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
ORNAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
ORNAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
ORNAX Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

FHTFX
FHTFX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
FHTFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHTFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHTFX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
FHTFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHTFX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ORNAX vs. FHTFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Rochester Municipal Opportunities Fund (ORNAX) and Federated Hermes Municipal High Yield Advtg Fd (FHTFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ORNAXFHTFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.63

-0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.89

3.55

-1.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.38

13.13

-6.75

ORNAX vs. FHTFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ORNAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is lower than the FHTFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ORNAX and FHTFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ORNAX vs. FHTFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ORNAX drawdown since its inception was -55.48%, which is greater than FHTFX's maximum drawdown of -27.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ORNAX and FHTFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ORNAXFHTFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.48%

-27.61%

-27.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.85%

-2.46%

-0.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.45%

-7.25%

-1.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.16%

-17.76%

-3.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.16%

-17.77%

-3.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.40%

-1.76%

-0.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.04%

-2.65%

-4.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.06%

0.71%

+0.35%

Volatility

ORNAX vs. FHTFX - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Rochester Municipal Opportunities Fund (ORNAX) has a higher volatility of 1.11% compared to Federated Hermes Municipal High Yield Advtg Fd (FHTFX) at 0.96%. This indicates that ORNAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FHTFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ORNAXFHTFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.11%

0.96%

+0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.86%

2.27%

+0.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.80%

3.30%

+0.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.07%

5.17%

+0.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.01%

4.86%

+1.15%

ORNAX vs. FHTFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ORNAX has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is lower than FHTFX's 0.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

ORNAX vs. FHTFX - Dividend Comparison

ORNAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.20%, less than FHTFX's 3.44% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FHTFX
Federated Hermes Municipal High Yield Advtg Fd
3.44%3.02%4.53%3.81%3.65%3.14%3.52%3.88%3.85%3.88%4.11%4.02%
ORNAX
Invesco Rochester Municipal Opportunities Fund
3.20%5.86%5.68%4.21%4.04%4.26%4.86%4.50%4.80%5.78%6.50%6.67%

Frequently Asked Questions


ORNAX and FHTFX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ORNAX has higher volatility (1.11%) compared to FHTFX (0.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ORNAX dropped -55.48% vs FHTFX's -27.61%.

FHTFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ORNAX and FHTFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer