PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ORIT.L vs. ASL.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ORIT.L vs. ASL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Octopus Renewables Infra Trust (ORIT.L) and Aberforth Smaller Companies Trust plc (ASL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ORIT.L achieves a 10.01% return, which is significantly higher than ASL.L's 5.03% return.


ORIT.L

1D
-0.78%
1M
10.17%
YTD
10.01%
6M
13.93%
1Y
-1.61%
3Y*
-6.07%
5Y*
-3.28%
10Y*

ASL.L

1D
-0.98%
1M
4.55%
YTD
5.03%
6M
7.07%
1Y
11.97%
3Y*
12.04%
5Y*
4.10%
10Y*
7.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ORIT.L vs. ASL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
ORIT.L
Octopus Renewables Infra Trust
10.01%-1.51%-18.31%-4.57%-5.40%1.72%7.83%0.66%
ASL.L
Aberforth Smaller Companies Trust plc
5.03%10.86%10.70%8.01%-7.29%20.31%-16.46%9.38%

Correlation

The correlation between ORIT.L and ASL.L is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2019

0.21

The correlation between ORIT.L and ASL.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (1 year) to 0.24 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ORIT.L:

£336.74M

ASL.L:

£1.31B

EPS

ORIT.L:

-£0.02

ASL.L:

£3.03

PS Ratio

ORIT.L:

5.56

ASL.L:

3.70

PB Ratio

ORIT.L:

0.68

ASL.L:

0.94

Total Revenue (TTM)

ORIT.L:

£61.83M

ASL.L:

£355.90M

Gross Profit (TTM)

ORIT.L:

£52.56M

ASL.L:

£383.46M

EBITDA (TTM)

ORIT.L:

-£7.00M

ASL.L:

£11.08M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ORIT.L vs. ASL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ORIT.L
ORIT.L Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
ORIT.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ORIT.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
ORIT.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
ORIT.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
ORIT.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

ASL.L
ASL.L Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
ASL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
ASL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ORIT.L vs. ASL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Octopus Renewables Infra Trust (ORIT.L) and Aberforth Smaller Companies Trust plc (ASL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ORIT.LASL.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.15

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.03

0.70

-0.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.05

2.17

-2.12

ORIT.L vs. ASL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ORIT.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.03, which is lower than the ASL.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ORIT.L and ASL.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ORIT.LASL.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.03

0.77

-0.73

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.15

0.24

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.09

0.60

-0.68

Drawdowns

ORIT.L vs. ASL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ORIT.L drawdown since its inception was -40.68%, smaller than the maximum ASL.L drawdown of -60.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ORIT.L and ASL.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ORIT.LASL.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.68%

-60.11%

+19.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.60%

-17.08%

-7.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.76%

-25.35%

-8.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.68%

-31.98%

-8.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-26.30%

-5.85%

-20.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.76%

-11.24%

-4.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.25%

5.50%

+9.75%

Volatility

ORIT.L vs. ASL.L - Volatility Comparison

Octopus Renewables Infra Trust (ORIT.L) has a higher volatility of 8.59% compared to Aberforth Smaller Companies Trust plc (ASL.L) at 4.66%. This indicates that ORIT.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ASL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ORIT.LASL.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.59%

4.66%

+3.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.11%

11.59%

+7.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.64%

15.55%

+7.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.68%

16.99%

+4.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.79%

21.40%

+0.39%

Dividends

ORIT.L vs. ASL.L - Dividend Comparison

ORIT.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.69%, more than ASL.L's 3.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ASL.L
Aberforth Smaller Companies Trust plc
3.65%3.20%3.48%3.50%2.75%2.31%2.92%2.50%3.16%2.30%2.63%2.11%
ORIT.L
Octopus Renewables Infra Trust
9.69%10.03%8.76%6.28%5.18%4.33%1.85%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

ORIT.L vs. ASL.L - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Octopus Renewables Infra Trust and Aberforth Smaller Companies Trust plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M20212022202320242025
20.24M
27.69M
(ORIT.L) Total Revenue
(ASL.L) Total Revenue
Values in GBp except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


ORIT.L and ASL.L have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ORIT.L and ASL.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer