ORBX vs. BSJQ
ORBX (Global X Space Tech ETF) and BSJQ (Invesco BulletShares 2026 High Yield Corp Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ORBX is a Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the Global X Space Tech Index, while BSJQ is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the NASDAQ BulletShares USD High Yield Corporate Bond 2026 TR Index. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.07, they often move in opposite directions. ORBX charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for BSJQ.
Performance
ORBX vs. BSJQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ORBX
- 1D
- -2.53%
- 1M
- -27.90%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BSJQ
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- -0.20%
- YTD
- 1.04%
- 6M
- 1.19%
- 1Y
- 4.19%
- 3Y*
- 7.08%
- 5Y*
- 3.67%
- 10Y*
- —
ORBX vs. BSJQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ORBX Global X Space Tech ETF | -2.51% |
BSJQ Invesco BulletShares 2026 High Yield Corp Bond ETF | -0.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between ORBX and BSJQ is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 15, 2026 | -0.07 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ORBX vs. BSJQ — Risk / Return Rank
ORBX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BSJQ
ORBX vs. BSJQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Space Tech ETF (ORBX) and Invesco BulletShares 2026 High Yield Corp Bond ETF (BSJQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ORBX | BSJQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.69 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 7.77 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 31.58 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ORBX vs. BSJQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ORBX drawdown since its inception was -35.85%, which is greater than BSJQ's maximum drawdown of -24.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ORBX and BSJQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ORBX | BSJQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.85% | -24.13% | -11.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.54% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -2.66% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -11.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -35.85% | -0.25% | -35.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.09% | -2.16% | -8.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.13% | — |
Volatility
ORBX vs. BSJQ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ORBX | BSJQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.61% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 1.01% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 81.94% | 1.36% | +80.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 81.94% | 5.73% | +76.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 81.94% | 8.42% | +73.52% |
ORBX vs. BSJQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
ORBX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than BSJQ's 0.42% expense ratio.
Dividends
ORBX vs. BSJQ - Dividend Comparison
ORBX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BSJQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.79%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSJQ Invesco BulletShares 2026 High Yield Corp Bond ETF | 5.79% | 6.10% | 6.58% | 6.58% | 5.58% | 4.27% | 4.64% | 4.59% | 2.39% |
ORBX Global X Space Tech ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ORBX and BSJQ have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BSJQ is cheaper at 0.42% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BSJQ is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for ORBX.
BSJQ has the higher dividend yield at 5.79%, compared with 0.00% for ORBX.
ORBX is categorized as Aerospace & Defense, while BSJQ is High Yield Bonds. ORBX tracks Global X Space Tech Index, while BSJQ tracks NASDAQ BulletShares USD High Yield Corporate Bond 2026 TR Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for ORBX and 0.42% for BSJQ.
Find the right allocation for ORBX and BSJQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer