PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OPTAX vs. MUC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OPTAX vs. MUC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco AMT-Free Municipal Fund (OPTAX) and BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund (MUC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OPTAX achieves a 1.51% return, which is significantly lower than MUC's 4.64% return. Over the past 10 years, OPTAX has outperformed MUC with an annualized return of 3.54%, while MUC has yielded a comparatively lower 0.87% annualized return.


OPTAX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.80%
YTD
1.51%
6M
1.71%
1Y
6.07%
3Y*
3.19%
5Y*
0.19%
10Y*
3.54%

MUC

1D
0.56%
1M
0.87%
YTD
4.64%
6M
4.18%
1Y
11.03%
3Y*
6.31%
5Y*
-2.58%
10Y*
0.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OPTAX vs. MUC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
OPTAX
Invesco AMT-Free Municipal Fund
1.51%2.70%2.13%6.64%-12.15%4.16%7.57%12.33%7.43%5.98%
MUC
BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund
4.64%5.96%0.76%7.86%-26.81%7.38%11.85%18.12%-9.00%6.07%

Correlation

The correlation between OPTAX and MUC is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 1998

0.25

The correlation between OPTAX and MUC shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (all time) to 0.49 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OPTAX vs. MUC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OPTAX
OPTAX Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
OPTAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OPTAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
OPTAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
OPTAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
OPTAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

MUC
MUC Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
MUC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MUC Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
MUC Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
MUC Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
MUC Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OPTAX vs. MUC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco AMT-Free Municipal Fund (OPTAX) and BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund (MUC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


OPTAXMUCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.27

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.42

1.70

+0.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.80

6.89

+0.90

OPTAX vs. MUC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OPTAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is higher than the MUC Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OPTAX and MUC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


OPTAXMUCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.96

1.37

+0.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

-0.23

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

0.07

+0.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.77

0.29

+0.48

Drawdowns

OPTAX vs. MUC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OPTAX drawdown since its inception was -48.56%, roughly equal to the maximum MUC drawdown of -48.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OPTAX and MUC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OPTAXMUCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.56%

-48.97%

+0.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.93%

-6.53%

+3.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.93%

-14.51%

+6.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.30%

-38.29%

+20.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.30%

-38.29%

+20.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.37%

-16.03%

+15.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.37%

-9.90%

+3.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.96%

1.61%

-0.65%

Volatility

OPTAX vs. MUC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco AMT-Free Municipal Fund (OPTAX) is 1.41%, while BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund (MUC) has a volatility of 2.40%. This indicates that OPTAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MUC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OPTAXMUCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.41%

2.40%

-0.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.54%

6.26%

-3.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.62%

8.07%

-4.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.03%

11.50%

-6.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.87%

11.89%

-7.02%

OPTAX vs. MUC - Expense Ratio Comparison

OPTAX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than MUC's 2.14% expense ratio.


Dividends

OPTAX vs. MUC - Dividend Comparison

OPTAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.68%, less than MUC's 5.93% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MUC
BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund
5.93%6.06%5.62%3.84%5.79%4.27%3.96%3.90%4.99%5.14%5.45%5.46%
OPTAX
Invesco AMT-Free Municipal Fund
2.68%4.23%4.16%3.02%2.99%3.43%3.80%3.75%3.82%4.71%5.77%6.05%

Frequently Asked Questions


OPTAX and MUC have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MUC has higher volatility (2.40%) compared to OPTAX (1.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OPTAX dropped -48.56% vs MUC's -48.97%.

OPTAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OPTAX and MUC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer