PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OPPJ vs. NTSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OPPJ vs. NTSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Japan Opportunities ETF (OPPJ) and WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OPPJ achieves a 21.36% return, which is significantly higher than NTSX's 8.99% return.


OPPJ

1D
-0.35%
1M
-2.28%
6M
11.10%
YTD
21.36%
1Y
52.64%
3Y*
31.02%
5Y*
24.18%
10Y*
17.17%
ALL TIME*
15.01%

NTSX

1D
1.59%
1M
1.07%
6M
7.46%
YTD
8.99%
1Y
19.38%
3Y*
18.54%
5Y*
8.42%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.98M$1.82M$2.61M
$2.37M$2.34M$4.35M

OPPJ vs. NTSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
OPPJ
WisdomTree Japan Opportunities ETF
21.36%37.08%20.70%38.96%5.02%11.66%-3.22%18.24%-16.99%
NTSX
WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund
8.99%18.82%20.20%22.70%-25.84%22.21%24.87%32.03%-7.87%

Correlation

The correlation between OPPJ and NTSX is 0.41, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2018

0.47

The correlation between OPPJ and NTSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (3 years) to 0.47 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OPPJ vs. NTSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

OPPJ
OPPJ Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
OPPJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OPPJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
OPPJ Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
OPPJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
OPPJ Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

NTSX
NTSX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
NTSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NTSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
NTSX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
NTSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
NTSX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

OPPJ vs. NTSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Japan Opportunities ETF (OPPJ) and WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


OPPJNTSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.26

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.38

2.12

+3.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.15

8.61

+6.54

OPPJ vs. NTSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OPPJ Sharpe Ratio is 2.50, which is higher than the NTSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OPPJ and NTSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

OPPJ vs. NTSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OPPJ drawdown since its inception was -39.30%, which is greater than NTSX's maximum drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OPPJ and NTSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OPPJNTSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.30%

-31.34%

-7.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.82%

-9.16%

-0.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.49%

-16.82%

+0.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.49%

-31.34%

+14.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.91%

-0.71%

-7.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.48%

-6.69%

+0.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.48%

2.26%

+1.22%

Volatility

OPPJ vs. NTSX - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Japan Opportunities ETF (OPPJ) has a higher volatility of 7.79% compared to WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX) at 4.14%. This indicates that OPPJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NTSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OPPJNTSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.79%

4.14%

+3.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.52%

10.85%

+6.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.19%

13.35%

+7.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.40%

17.22%

+1.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.61%

18.23%

+1.38%

OPPJ vs. NTSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

OPPJ has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than NTSX's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

OPPJ vs. NTSX - Dividend Comparison

OPPJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%, more than NTSX's 1.08% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NTSX
WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund
1.08%1.14%1.14%1.21%1.36%0.82%0.92%1.42%0.62%0.00%0.00%0.00%
OPPJ
WisdomTree Japan Opportunities ETF
1.15%1.78%4.02%2.71%2.63%2.96%3.04%2.17%2.06%1.53%1.66%3.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


OPPJ and NTSX have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OPPJ has higher volatility (7.79%) compared to NTSX (4.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OPPJ dropped -39.30% vs NTSX's -31.34%.

On 5-year performance, OPPJ leads with 24.18% vs 8.42% for NTSX. On fees, NTSX is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, NTSX has been the lower-risk option at 4.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, OPPJ has performed better with a 24.18% return vs 8.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NTSX is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for OPPJ.

OPPJ has the higher dividend yield at 1.15%, compared with 1.08% for NTSX.

OPPJ is categorized as Japan Equities, while NTSX is Diversified Portfolio. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for OPPJ and 0.20% for NTSX.

OPPJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OPPJ and NTSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer