OPPJ vs. NBJP
OPPJ (WisdomTree Japan Opportunities ETF) and NBJP (Neuberger Berman Japan Equity ETF) are both Japan Equities funds. OPPJ is passively managed, while NBJP is actively managed. Over the past year, OPPJ returned 64.97% vs 35.11% for NBJP. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. OPPJ charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for NBJP.
Performance
OPPJ vs. NBJP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OPPJ achieves a 26.16% return, which is significantly higher than NBJP's 18.88% return.
OPPJ
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 2.99%
- YTD
- 26.16%
- 6M
- 32.96%
- 1Y
- 64.97%
- 3Y*
- 34.91%
- 5Y*
- 25.18%
- 10Y*
- 17.36%
NBJP
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- 7.23%
- YTD
- 18.88%
- 6M
- 21.26%
- 1Y
- 35.11%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OPPJ vs. NBJP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
OPPJ WisdomTree Japan Opportunities ETF | 26.16% | 37.08% | 9.01% |
NBJP Neuberger Berman Japan Equity ETF | 18.88% | 30.41% | -3.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between OPPJ and NBJP is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2024 | 0.72 |
The correlation between OPPJ and NBJP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OPPJ vs. NBJP — Risk / Return Rank
OPPJ
NBJP
OPPJ vs. NBJP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Japan Opportunities ETF (OPPJ) and Neuberger Berman Japan Equity ETF (NBJP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| OPPJ | NBJP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.55 | 1.32 | +0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.65 | 2.46 | +4.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 23.90 | 8.84 | +15.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OPPJ | NBJP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.33 | 1.79 | +1.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.40 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.88 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.76 | 1.37 | -0.61 |
Drawdowns
OPPJ vs. NBJP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OPPJ drawdown since its inception was -39.30%, which is greater than NBJP's maximum drawdown of -14.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OPPJ and NBJP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OPPJ | NBJP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.30% | -14.34% | -24.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.82% | -14.34% | +4.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.49% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.49% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.30% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.27% | -0.79% | -3.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.49% | -3.22% | -3.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.73% | 3.98% | -1.25% |
Volatility
OPPJ vs. NBJP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for WisdomTree Japan Opportunities ETF (OPPJ) is 5.08%, while Neuberger Berman Japan Equity ETF (NBJP) has a volatility of 5.49%. This indicates that OPPJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NBJP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OPPJ | NBJP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.08% | 5.49% | -0.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.39% | 16.51% | -1.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.64% | 19.76% | -0.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.05% | 19.55% | -1.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.71% | 19.55% | +0.16% |
OPPJ vs. NBJP - Expense Ratio Comparison
OPPJ has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than NBJP's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
OPPJ vs. NBJP - Dividend Comparison
OPPJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.50%, less than NBJP's 1.92% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NBJP Neuberger Berman Japan Equity ETF | 1.92% | 2.29% | 0.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
OPPJ WisdomTree Japan Opportunities ETF | 1.50% | 1.78% | 4.02% | 2.71% | 2.63% | 2.96% | 3.04% | 2.17% | 2.06% | 1.53% | 1.66% | 3.61% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OPPJ and NBJP have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NBJP has higher volatility (5.49%) compared to OPPJ (5.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OPPJ dropped -39.30% vs NBJP's -14.34%.
On 1-year performance, OPPJ leads with 64.97% vs 35.11% for NBJP. On fees, NBJP is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, OPPJ has been the lower-risk option at 5.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, OPPJ has performed better with a 64.97% return vs 35.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NBJP is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for OPPJ.
NBJP has the higher dividend yield at 1.92%, compared with 1.50% for OPPJ.
They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Neuberger Berman. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for OPPJ and 0.50% for NBJP.
OPPJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.33 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OPPJ and NBJP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer