PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OP6E.DE vs. XCS3.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OP6E.DE vs. XCS3.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Ossiam Bloomberg Asia Pacific ex Japan PAB NR UCITS ETF (EUR) (OP6E.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Malaysia UCITS ETF (Acc) (XCS3.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OP6E.DE achieves a 10.68% return, which is significantly higher than XCS3.DE's 6.71% return.


OP6E.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
4.74%
6M
7.84%
YTD
10.68%
1Y
15.24%
3Y*
11.76%
5Y*
10Y*

XCS3.DE

1D
-0.39%
1M
1.35%
6M
2.09%
YTD
6.71%
1Y
25.44%
3Y*
13.41%
5Y*
6.81%
10Y*
1.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OP6E.DE vs. XCS3.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
OP6E.DE
Ossiam Bloomberg Asia Pacific ex Japan PAB NR UCITS ETF (EUR)
10.68%6.39%15.17%0.41%-0.63%
XCS3.DE
Xtrackers MSCI Malaysia UCITS ETF (Acc)
6.71%3.11%26.75%-7.60%2.92%

Correlation

The correlation between OP6E.DE and XCS3.DE is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 2022

0.37

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OP6E.DE vs. XCS3.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OP6E.DE
OP6E.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
OP6E.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OP6E.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
OP6E.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
OP6E.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
OP6E.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

XCS3.DE
XCS3.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
XCS3.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XCS3.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
XCS3.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
XCS3.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
XCS3.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OP6E.DE vs. XCS3.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ossiam Bloomberg Asia Pacific ex Japan PAB NR UCITS ETF (EUR) (OP6E.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Malaysia UCITS ETF (Acc) (XCS3.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


OP6E.DEXCS3.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.31

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.26

3.22

-0.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.52

8.69

-3.17

OP6E.DE vs. XCS3.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OP6E.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is comparable to the XCS3.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OP6E.DE and XCS3.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

OP6E.DE vs. XCS3.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OP6E.DE drawdown since its inception was -18.34%, smaller than the maximum XCS3.DE drawdown of -43.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OP6E.DE and XCS3.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OP6E.DEXCS3.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.34%

-43.32%

+24.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.72%

-7.85%

+1.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.34%

-21.83%

+3.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-3.93%

+3.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.70%

-17.42%

+12.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.75%

2.92%

-0.17%

Volatility

OP6E.DE vs. XCS3.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Ossiam Bloomberg Asia Pacific ex Japan PAB NR UCITS ETF (EUR) (OP6E.DE) is 2.14%, while Xtrackers MSCI Malaysia UCITS ETF (Acc) (XCS3.DE) has a volatility of 3.80%. This indicates that OP6E.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XCS3.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OP6E.DEXCS3.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.14%

3.80%

-1.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.75%

10.88%

-2.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.72%

14.01%

-2.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.50%

13.14%

+1.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.50%

15.01%

-0.51%

OP6E.DE vs. XCS3.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

OP6E.DE has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than XCS3.DE's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

OP6E.DE vs. XCS3.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither OP6E.DE nor XCS3.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


OP6E.DE and XCS3.DE have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, OP6E.DE is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

OP6E.DE is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for XCS3.DE.

OP6E.DE tracks Bloomberg PAB APAC DM ex-Japan Large & Mid Cap, while XCS3.DE tracks MSCI Malaysia Index. They also come from different issuers: Natixis and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for OP6E.DE and 0.50% for XCS3.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OP6E.DE and XCS3.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer