PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OP5E.DE vs. PR1J.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OP5E.DE vs. PR1J.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Ossiam Bloomberg Japan PAB NR UCITS ETF (EUR) (OP5E.DE) and Amundi Prime Japan UCITS ETF DR (D) (PR1J.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OP5E.DE achieves a 17.74% return, which is significantly higher than PR1J.DE's 15.82% return.


OP5E.DE

1D
-0.31%
1M
4.89%
YTD
17.74%
6M
17.51%
1Y
30.15%
3Y*
13.12%
5Y*
10Y*

PR1J.DE

1D
-0.01%
1M
3.47%
YTD
15.82%
6M
16.06%
1Y
30.46%
3Y*
15.30%
5Y*
10.01%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OP5E.DE vs. PR1J.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
OP5E.DE
Ossiam Bloomberg Japan PAB NR UCITS ETF (EUR)
17.74%8.90%10.84%14.78%-8.63%
PR1J.DE
Amundi Prime Japan UCITS ETF DR (D)
15.82%12.92%13.38%16.35%-7.20%

Correlation

The correlation between OP5E.DE and PR1J.DE is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 23, 2022

0.93

The correlation between OP5E.DE and PR1J.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OP5E.DE vs. PR1J.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OP5E.DE
OP5E.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
OP5E.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OP5E.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
OP5E.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
OP5E.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
OP5E.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

PR1J.DE
PR1J.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
PR1J.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PR1J.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
PR1J.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
PR1J.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
PR1J.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OP5E.DE vs. PR1J.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ossiam Bloomberg Japan PAB NR UCITS ETF (EUR) (OP5E.DE) and Amundi Prime Japan UCITS ETF DR (D) (PR1J.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


OP5E.DEPR1J.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.30

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.81

2.83

-0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.37

9.22

+0.15

OP5E.DE vs. PR1J.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OP5E.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is comparable to the PR1J.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OP5E.DE and PR1J.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


OP5E.DEPR1J.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.59

1.54

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

0.58

+0.08

Drawdowns

OP5E.DE vs. PR1J.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OP5E.DE drawdown since its inception was -16.97%, smaller than the maximum PR1J.DE drawdown of -28.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OP5E.DE and PR1J.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OP5E.DEPR1J.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.97%

-28.08%

+11.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.35%

-10.30%

-0.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.97%

-16.24%

-0.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.31%

-0.01%

-0.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.10%

-5.53%

+1.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.12%

3.17%

-0.05%

Volatility

OP5E.DE vs. PR1J.DE - Volatility Comparison

Ossiam Bloomberg Japan PAB NR UCITS ETF (EUR) (OP5E.DE) and Amundi Prime Japan UCITS ETF DR (D) (PR1J.DE) have volatilities of 3.48% and 3.43%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OP5E.DEPR1J.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.48%

3.43%

+0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.30%

15.05%

-0.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.38%

18.93%

-0.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.72%

16.50%

+0.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.72%

17.41%

-0.69%

OP5E.DE vs. PR1J.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

OP5E.DE has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than PR1J.DE's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

OP5E.DE vs. PR1J.DE - Dividend Comparison

OP5E.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PR1J.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
OP5E.DE
Ossiam Bloomberg Japan PAB NR UCITS ETF (EUR)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PR1J.DE
Amundi Prime Japan UCITS ETF DR (D)
1.51%1.75%1.91%1.90%2.21%1.79%1.73%1.88%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, OP5E.DE and PR1J.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, PR1J.DE is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PR1J.DE is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for OP5E.DE.

OP5E.DE tracks Bloomberg PAB Japan Large & Mid Cap, while PR1J.DE tracks Solactive GBS Japan Large & Mid Cap. They also come from different issuers: Natixis and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for OP5E.DE and 0.05% for PR1J.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OP5E.DE and PR1J.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer