PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ONON vs. AS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ONON vs. AS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in On Holding AG (ONON) and Amer Sports, Inc (AS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ONON achieves a -19.28% return, which is significantly lower than AS's -8.01% return.


ONON

1D
-2.09%
1M
9.42%
YTD
-19.28%
6M
-20.29%
1Y
-35.90%
3Y*
10.29%
5Y*
10Y*

AS

1D
-2.97%
1M
1.30%
YTD
-8.01%
6M
-7.03%
1Y
-8.28%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ONON vs. AS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
ONON
On Holding AG
-19.28%-15.14%104.37%
AS
Amer Sports, Inc
-8.01%33.58%108.66%

Correlation

The correlation between ONON and AS is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2024

0.42

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ONON:

$12.59B

AS:

$19.66B

EPS

ONON:

$0.75

AS:

$0.81

PE Ratio

ONON:

49.94

AS:

42.45

PEG Ratio

ONON:

0.73

AS:

0.10

PS Ratio

ONON:

4.02

AS:

2.76

PB Ratio

ONON:

7.13

AS:

2.92

Total Revenue (TTM)

ONON:

$3.13B

AS:

$7.04B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ONON:

$2.00B

AS:

$4.10B

EBITDA (TTM)

ONON:

$422.52M

AS:

$1.02B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ONON vs. AS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ONON
ONON Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
ONON Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ONON Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
ONON Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
ONON Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
ONON Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

AS
AS Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
AS Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
AS Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ONON vs. AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for On Holding AG (ONON) and Amer Sports, Inc (AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ONONASDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.87

1.00

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.80

-0.29

-0.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.37

-0.58

-0.79

ONON vs. AS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ONON Sharpe Ratio is -0.80, which is lower than the AS Sharpe Ratio of -0.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ONON and AS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ONONASDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.80

-0.20

-0.60

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.03

1.01

-0.98

Drawdowns

ONON vs. AS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ONON drawdown since its inception was -68.90%, which is greater than AS's maximum drawdown of -40.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ONON and AS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ONONASDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.90%

-40.71%

-28.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-45.06%

-28.78%

-16.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-49.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-41.02%

-18.11%

-22.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-36.01%

-13.27%

-22.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

26.81%

14.27%

+12.54%

Volatility

ONON vs. AS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for On Holding AG (ONON) is 11.63%, while Amer Sports, Inc (AS) has a volatility of 12.33%. This indicates that ONON experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ONONASDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.63%

12.33%

-0.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.55%

29.05%

+2.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

45.02%

40.79%

+4.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

57.29%

49.70%

+7.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

57.29%

49.70%

+7.59%

Dividends

ONON vs. AS - Dividend Comparison

Neither ONON nor AS has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

ONON vs. AS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between On Holding AG and Amer Sports, Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B20222023202420252026
850.46M
1.95B
(ONON) Total Revenue
(AS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ONON vs. AS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between On Holding AG and Amer Sports, Inc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

50.0%55.0%60.0%65.0%20222023202420252026
64.2%
59.9%
Portfolio components
ONON - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, On Holding AG reported a gross profit of 546.22M and revenue of 850.46M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 64.2%.

AS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amer Sports, Inc reported a gross profit of 1.17B and revenue of 1.95B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 59.9%.

ONON - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, On Holding AG reported an operating income of 120.02M and revenue of 850.46M, resulting in an operating margin of 14.1%.

AS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amer Sports, Inc reported an operating income of 313.30M and revenue of 1.95B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.1%.

ONON - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, On Holding AG reported a net income of 105.60M and revenue of 850.46M, resulting in a net margin of 12.4%.

AS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amer Sports, Inc reported a net income of 164.60M and revenue of 1.95B, resulting in a net margin of 8.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ONON and AS have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AS has higher volatility (12.33%) compared to ONON (11.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ONON dropped -68.90% vs AS's -40.71%.

AS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.20 vs -0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ONON and AS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer