PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ONERX vs. LSGRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ONERX vs. LSGRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in One Rock Fund (ONERX) and Loomis Sayles Growth Fund (LSGRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ONERX vs. LSGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
ONERX
One Rock Fund
-1.48%49.37%21.76%72.41%-42.06%45.70%104.46%
LSGRX
Loomis Sayles Growth Fund
-11.62%14.01%35.21%51.30%-27.86%18.68%46.28%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ONERX achieves a -1.48% return, which is significantly higher than LSGRX's -11.62% return.


ONERX

1D
7.72%
1M
-7.71%
YTD
-1.48%
6M
-2.85%
1Y
79.18%
3Y*
35.95%
5Y*
20.20%
10Y*

LSGRX

1D
3.75%
1M
-6.05%
YTD
-11.62%
6M
-12.10%
1Y
11.30%
3Y*
19.29%
5Y*
11.05%
10Y*
15.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ONERX vs. LSGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ONERX has a 1.75% expense ratio, which is higher than LSGRX's 0.64% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

ONERX vs. LSGRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ONERX
ONERX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
ONERX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ONERX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
ONERX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
ONERX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
ONERX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

LSGRX
LSGRX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
LSGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LSGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
LSGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
LSGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
LSGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ONERX vs. LSGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for One Rock Fund (ONERX) and Loomis Sayles Growth Fund (LSGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ONERXLSGRXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.96

0.59

+1.37

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.42

1.06

+1.36

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.14

+0.20

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.49

-0.12

+4.61

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.11

-0.36

+15.48

ONERX vs. LSGRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ONERX Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is higher than the LSGRX Sharpe Ratio of 0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ONERX and LSGRX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ONERXLSGRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.96

0.59

+1.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

0.51

-0.49

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.04

0.43

-0.39

Correlation

The correlation between ONERX and LSGRX is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

ONERX vs. LSGRX - Dividend Comparison

ONERX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 24.48%, more than LSGRX's 2.51% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ONERX
One Rock Fund
24.48%24.12%0.00%0.00%10.57%28.88%18.66%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LSGRX
Loomis Sayles Growth Fund
2.51%2.22%5.62%6.02%16.47%4.73%4.41%2.70%5.82%2.41%1.48%0.54%

Drawdowns

ONERX vs. LSGRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ONERX drawdown since its inception was -96.43%, which is greater than LSGRX's maximum drawdown of -63.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ONERX and LSGRX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ONERXLSGRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.43%

-63.63%

-32.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.63%

-17.83%

+0.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-96.43%

-34.69%

-61.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-92.58%

-14.57%

-78.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.62%

-18.01%

-12.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.24%

7.83%

-2.59%

Volatility

ONERX vs. LSGRX - Volatility Comparison

One Rock Fund (ONERX) has a higher volatility of 18.51% compared to Loomis Sayles Growth Fund (LSGRX) at 6.43%. This indicates that ONERX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LSGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ONERXLSGRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.51%

6.43%

+12.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.07%

12.95%

+18.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

41.95%

25.34%

+16.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

821.63%

22.61%

+799.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

747.39%

20.87%

+726.52%