PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
ONEQ.TO vs. XMW.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

ONEQ.TO vs. XMW.TO

Last updated Jul 1, 2026
See Documentation

ONEQ.TO (CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF) and XMW.TO (iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF) are both Global Equities funds. ONEQ.TO is actively managed, while XMW.TO is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ONEQ.TO returned 12.40%/yr vs 7.33%/yr for XMW.TO. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

ONEQ.TO vs. XMW.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF (ONEQ.TO) and iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF (XMW.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ONEQ.TO achieves a 12.41% return, which is significantly higher than XMW.TO's 5.35% return. Over the past 10 years, ONEQ.TO has outperformed XMW.TO with an annualized return of 12.40%, while XMW.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 7.33% annualized return.

ONEQ.TO

1D
-0.02%
1M
-0.52%
YTD
12.41%
6M
12.14%
1Y
26.29%
3Y*
21.18%
5Y*
12.91%
10Y*
12.40%

XMW.TO

1D
-0.15%
1M
2.20%
YTD
5.35%
6M
5.20%
1Y
7.29%
3Y*
11.45%
5Y*
7.72%
10Y*
7.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ONEQ.TO vs. XMW.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ONEQ.TO
CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF		12.41%17.62%22.45%19.07%-10.74%21.65%8.21%22.22%-10.36%13.10%
XMW.TO
iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF		5.35%5.84%20.05%4.68%-4.33%12.80%0.51%14.74%5.95%10.19%

Correlation

The correlation between ONEQ.TO and XMW.TO is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2015

0.22

The correlation between ONEQ.TO and XMW.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (1 year) to 0.23 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF

iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF

Often compared with XMW.TO:
XMW.TO vs. ZLB.TOXMW.TO vs. ACWVXMW.TO vs. XMV.TOXMW.TO vs. XEF.TOXMW.TO vs. XEQT.TOXMW.TO vs. VXC.TOXMW.TO vs. XDIV.TO

Return for Risk

ONEQ.TO vs. XMW.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
ONEQ.TO
ONEQ.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
ONEQ.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ONEQ.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
ONEQ.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
ONEQ.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
ONEQ.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
XMW.TO
XMW.TO Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
XMW.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMW.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMW.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
XMW.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMW.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ONEQ.TO vs. XMW.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF (ONEQ.TO) and iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF (XMW.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

ONEQ.TOXMW.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.29
0.96

+1.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.32
1.39

+1.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.17

+0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.08

1.43

+2.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.06

3.95

+14.11

ONEQ.TO vs. XMW.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ONEQ.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.29, which is higher than the XMW.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ONEQ.TO and XMW.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ONEQ.TO vs. XMW.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ONEQ.TO drawdown since its inception was -34.40%, which is greater than XMW.TO's maximum drawdown of -21.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ONEQ.TO and XMW.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

ONEQ.TOXMW.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.40%

-21.42%

-12.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.66%

-5.14%

-1.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.08%

-8.59%

-7.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.61%

-14.45%

-3.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.40%

-21.42%

-12.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.58%

-0.15%

-1.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.71%

-2.73%

-0.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.50%

1.85%

-0.35%

Volatility

ONEQ.TO vs. XMW.TO - Volatility Comparison

CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF (ONEQ.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.68% compared to iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF (XMW.TO) at 1.57%. This indicates that ONEQ.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XMW.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

ONEQ.TOXMW.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.68%

1.57%

+2.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.89%

5.55%

+4.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.89%

7.59%

+4.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.27%

8.70%

+4.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.93%

11.05%

+2.88%

Dividends

ONEQ.TO vs. XMW.TO - Dividend Comparison

ONEQ.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.62%, more than XMW.TO's 1.44% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ONEQ.TO
CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF		1.62%1.60%1.05%1.53%1.38%0.89%1.22%1.39%0.94%1.03%1.22%0.00%
XMW.TO
iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF		1.44%1.58%1.81%1.98%1.66%1.43%1.52%2.20%2.01%1.61%2.02%1.85%

Frequently Asked Questions

ONEQ.TO and XMW.TO have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

They also come from different issuers: CI and iShares.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ONEQ.TO and XMW.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer