ONEQ.TO vs. EVO.TO
ONEQ.TO (CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF) and EVO.TO (Evovest Global Equity ETF) are both Global Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, ONEQ.TO returned 25.20% vs -3.12% for EVO.TO. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ONEQ.TO vs. EVO.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ONEQ.TO achieves a 13.96% return, which is significantly higher than EVO.TO's 7.94% return.
ONEQ.TO
- 1D
- -1.11%
- 1M
- 0.37%
- 6M
- 9.99%
- YTD
- 13.96%
- 1Y
- 25.20%
- 3Y*
- 20.30%
- 5Y*
- 13.10%
- 10Y*
- 11.86%
EVO.TO
- 1D
- -0.93%
- 1M
- -3.84%
- 6M
- 3.30%
- YTD
- 7.94%
- 1Y
- -3.12%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ONEQ.TO vs. EVO.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ONEQ.TO CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF | 13.96% | 17.62% | 11.22% |
EVO.TO Evovest Global Equity ETF | 7.94% | 4.38% | 1.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between ONEQ.TO and EVO.TO is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2024 | 0.32 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ONEQ.TO vs. EVO.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ONEQ.TO
EVO.TO
ONEQ.TO vs. EVO.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF (ONEQ.TO) and Evovest Global Equity ETF (EVO.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ONEQ.TO | EVO.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 0.99 | +0.43 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.80 | -0.16 | +3.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.75 | -0.33 | +17.08 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ONEQ.TO vs. EVO.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ONEQ.TO drawdown since its inception was -34.40%, which is greater than EVO.TO's maximum drawdown of -19.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ONEQ.TO and EVO.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ONEQ.TO | EVO.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.40% | -19.36% | -15.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.66% | -19.36% | +12.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.08% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.61% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.40% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.20% | -10.62% | +9.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.69% | -4.89% | +1.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.51% | 9.53% | -8.02% |
Volatility
ONEQ.TO vs. EVO.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF (ONEQ.TO) is 2.83%, while Evovest Global Equity ETF (EVO.TO) has a volatility of 3.52%. This indicates that ONEQ.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EVO.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ONEQ.TO | EVO.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.83% | 3.52% | -0.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.93% | 10.81% | -0.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.03% | 21.14% | -9.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.29% | 19.74% | -6.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.91% | 19.74% | -5.83% |
Dividends
ONEQ.TO vs. EVO.TO - Dividend Comparison
ONEQ.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.60%, more than EVO.TO's 0.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EVO.TO Evovest Global Equity ETF | 0.62% | 0.67% | 0.82% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ONEQ.TO CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF | 1.60% | 1.60% | 1.05% | 1.53% | 1.38% | 0.89% | 1.22% | 1.39% | 0.94% | 1.03% | 1.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ONEQ.TO and EVO.TO have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
They also come from different issuers: CI and National Bank Investments.
Find the right allocation for ONEQ.TO and EVO.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer