ONEQ.TO vs. CBCX.TO
ONEQ.TO (CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF) and CBCX.TO (CI Galaxy Blockchain Index ETF CAD) are both exchange-traded funds - ONEQ.TO is a Global Equities fund actively managed by CI, while CBCX.TO is a Blockchain fund tracking the Alerian Galaxy Global Cryptocurrency-Focused Blockchain Technology NTR Hedged (CAD). ONEQ.TO is actively managed, while CBCX.TO is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, ONEQ.TO returned 21.18%/yr vs 46.73%/yr for CBCX.TO. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ONEQ.TO vs. CBCX.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ONEQ.TO achieves a 12.41% return, which is significantly higher than CBCX.TO's 6.72% return.
ONEQ.TO
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- -0.52%
- YTD
- 12.41%
- 6M
- 12.14%
- 1Y
- 26.29%
- 3Y*
- 21.18%
- 5Y*
- 12.91%
- 10Y*
- 12.40%
CBCX.TO
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- -8.66%
- YTD
- 6.72%
- 6M
- 4.92%
- 1Y
- 36.52%
- 3Y*
- 46.73%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ONEQ.TO vs. CBCX.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ONEQ.TO CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF | 12.41% | 17.62% | 22.45% | 19.07% | -3.88% |
CBCX.TO CI Galaxy Blockchain Index ETF CAD | 6.72% | 21.63% | 82.92% | 108.11% | -46.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between ONEQ.TO and CBCX.TO is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 9, 2022 | 0.15 |
The correlation between ONEQ.TO and CBCX.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (all time) to 0.26 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ONEQ.TO vs. CBCX.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ONEQ.TO
CBCX.TO
ONEQ.TO vs. CBCX.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF (ONEQ.TO) and CI Galaxy Blockchain Index ETF CAD (CBCX.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ONEQ.TO | CBCX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.69 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.15 | +0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.08 | 0.68 | +3.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.06 | 1.20 | +16.86 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ONEQ.TO vs. CBCX.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ONEQ.TO drawdown since its inception was -34.40%, smaller than the maximum CBCX.TO drawdown of -55.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ONEQ.TO and CBCX.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ONEQ.TO | CBCX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.40% | -55.21% | +20.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.66% | -54.19% | +47.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.08% | -55.21% | +39.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.61% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.40% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.58% | -35.09% | +33.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.71% | -23.92% | +20.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.50% | 30.48% | -28.98% |
Volatility
ONEQ.TO vs. CBCX.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF (ONEQ.TO) is 3.68%, while CI Galaxy Blockchain Index ETF CAD (CBCX.TO) has a volatility of 17.68%. This indicates that ONEQ.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CBCX.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ONEQ.TO | CBCX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.68% | 17.68% | -14.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.89% | 42.50% | -32.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.89% | 61.19% | -49.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.27% | 62.66% | -49.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.93% | 62.66% | -48.73% |
Dividends
ONEQ.TO vs. CBCX.TO - Dividend Comparison
ONEQ.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.62%, more than CBCX.TO's 0.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CBCX.TO CI Galaxy Blockchain Index ETF CAD | 0.03% | 0.14% | 0.13% | 0.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ONEQ.TO CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF | 1.62% | 1.60% | 1.05% | 1.53% | 1.38% | 0.89% | 1.22% | 1.39% | 0.94% | 1.03% | 1.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ONEQ.TO and CBCX.TO have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ONEQ.TO is categorized as Global Equities, while CBCX.TO is Blockchain.
Find the right allocation for ONEQ.TO and CBCX.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer