OMAH vs. TPRY

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH) and VistaShares Target 15 TEPRTantrum Contrarian Distribution ETF (TPRY).

OMAH and TPRY are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. OMAH is an actively managed fund by VistaShares. It was launched on Mar 4, 2025. TPRY is a passively managed fund by VistaShares that tracks the performance of the BITA VistaShares TEPRTantrum Select. It was launched on Feb 26, 2026.

Performance

OMAH vs. TPRY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH) and VistaShares Target 15 TEPRTantrum Contrarian Distribution ETF (TPRY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

OMAH vs. TPRY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
OMAH VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF	-1.09%
TPRY VistaShares Target 15 TEPRTantrum Contrarian Distribution ETF	-7.64%

Returns By Period

OMAH

• 1D: 0.84%
• 1M: -0.44%
• YTD: -0.14%
• 6M: 0.87%
• 1Y: 6.14%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TPRY

• 1D: 3.60%
• 1M: -6.34%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OMAH vs. TPRY - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both OMAH and TPRY have an expense ratio of 0.95%.

OMAH

VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF

TPRY

VistaShares Target 15 TEPRTantrum Contrarian Distribution ETF

Return for Risk

OMAH vs. TPRY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OMAH

OMAH Risk / Return Rank: 30
OMAH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
OMAH Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
OMAH Omega Ratio Rank: 30
OMAH Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
OMAH Martin Ratio Rank: 38

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OMAH vs. TPRY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH) and VistaShares Target 15 TEPRTantrum Contrarian Distribution ETF (TPRY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	OMAH	TPRY	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.44	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.71	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.61	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.30	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	OMAH	TPRY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.44	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.44	-2.22	+2.66

Correlation

The correlation between OMAH and TPRY is 0.51, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

OMAH vs. TPRY - Dividend Comparison

OMAH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.81%, more than TPRY's 1.25% yield.

	TTM	2025
OMAH VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF	15.81%	12.86%
TPRY VistaShares Target 15 TEPRTantrum Contrarian Distribution ETF	1.25%	0.00%

Drawdowns

OMAH vs. TPRY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OMAH drawdown since its inception was -11.83%, which is greater than TPRY's maximum drawdown of -10.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OMAH and TPRY.

Drawdown Indicators

	OMAH	TPRY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.83%	-10.85%	-0.98%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.18%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.71%	-7.64%	+5.93%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.39%	-5.79%	+4.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.08%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	OMAH	TPRY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.91%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.31%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.94%	26.75%	-12.81%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.00%	26.75%	-12.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.00%	26.75%	-12.75%