OMAH vs. FYEE
OMAH (VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF) and FYEE (Fidelity Yield Enhanced Equity ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, OMAH returned 11.44% vs 24.64% for FYEE. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. OMAH charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for FYEE.
Performance
OMAH vs. FYEE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OMAH achieves a 4.56% return, which is significantly lower than FYEE's 7.03% return.
OMAH
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 0.44%
- YTD
- 4.56%
- 6M
- 4.00%
- 1Y
- 11.44%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FYEE
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- 3.22%
- YTD
- 7.03%
- 6M
- 8.52%
- 1Y
- 24.64%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OMAH vs. FYEE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
OMAH VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF | 4.56% | 6.74% |
FYEE Fidelity Yield Enhanced Equity ETF | 7.03% | 16.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between OMAH and FYEE is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2025 | 0.60 |
The correlation between OMAH and FYEE shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (1 year) to 0.60 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OMAH vs. FYEE — Risk / Return Rank
OMAH
FYEE
OMAH vs. FYEE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH) and Fidelity Yield Enhanced Equity ETF (FYEE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| OMAH | FYEE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.52 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.82 | 3.35 | +0.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.48 | 17.14 | -7.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OMAH | FYEE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.43 | 2.57 | -1.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.70 | 1.24 | -0.54 |
Drawdowns
OMAH vs. FYEE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OMAH drawdown since its inception was -11.83%, smaller than the maximum FYEE drawdown of -18.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OMAH and FYEE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OMAH | FYEE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.83% | -18.79% | +6.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.00% | -7.39% | +4.39% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.65% | -0.30% | -2.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.26% | -2.25% | +0.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.21% | 1.44% | -0.23% |
Volatility
OMAH vs. FYEE - Volatility Comparison
VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH) has a higher volatility of 1.93% compared to Fidelity Yield Enhanced Equity ETF (FYEE) at 1.43%. This indicates that OMAH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FYEE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OMAH | FYEE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.93% | 1.43% | +0.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.49% | 7.26% | -1.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.05% | 9.64% | -1.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.21% | 13.84% | -0.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.21% | 13.84% | -0.63% |
OMAH vs. FYEE - Expense Ratio Comparison
OMAH has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than FYEE's 0.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
OMAH vs. FYEE - Dividend Comparison
OMAH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.44%, more than FYEE's 7.57% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
FYEE Fidelity Yield Enhanced Equity ETF | 7.57% | 7.08% | 5.45% |
OMAH VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF | 15.44% | 12.86% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OMAH and FYEE have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OMAH has higher volatility (1.93%) compared to FYEE (1.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OMAH dropped -11.83% vs FYEE's -18.79%.
On 1-year performance, FYEE leads with 24.64% vs 11.44% for OMAH. On fees, FYEE is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, FYEE has been the lower-risk option at 1.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, FYEE has performed better with a 24.64% return vs 11.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FYEE is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for OMAH.
OMAH has the higher dividend yield at 15.44%, compared with 7.57% for FYEE.
They also come from different issuers: VistaShares and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for OMAH and 0.28% for FYEE.
FYEE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OMAH and FYEE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer