PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OMAH vs. DHSB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OMAH vs. DHSB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH) and Day Hagan Smart Buffer ETF (DHSB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OMAH achieves a 4.56% return, which is significantly higher than DHSB's 4.21% return.


OMAH

1D
-0.70%
1M
0.44%
YTD
4.56%
6M
4.00%
1Y
11.44%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DHSB

1D
-0.01%
1M
1.26%
YTD
4.21%
6M
5.04%
1Y
9.84%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OMAH vs. DHSB - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between OMAH and DHSB is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2025

0.54

The correlation between OMAH and DHSB shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (1 year) to 0.54 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OMAH vs. DHSB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OMAH
OMAH Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
OMAH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OMAH Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
OMAH Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
OMAH Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
OMAH Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

DHSB
DHSB Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
DHSB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DHSB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
DHSB Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
DHSB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
DHSB Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OMAH vs. DHSB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH) and Day Hagan Smart Buffer ETF (DHSB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


OMAHDHSBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.41

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.82

2.98

+0.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.48

15.55

-6.07

OMAH vs. DHSB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OMAH Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is comparable to the DHSB Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OMAH and DHSB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


OMAHDHSBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.43

1.74

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.70

0.82

-0.12

Drawdowns

OMAH vs. DHSB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OMAH drawdown since its inception was -11.83%, which is greater than DHSB's maximum drawdown of -7.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OMAH and DHSB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OMAHDHSBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.83%

-7.65%

-4.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.00%

-3.32%

+0.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.65%

-0.37%

-2.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.26%

-0.88%

-0.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.21%

0.63%

+0.58%

Volatility

OMAH vs. DHSB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH) is 1.93%, while Day Hagan Smart Buffer ETF (DHSB) has a volatility of 3.65%. This indicates that OMAH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DHSB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OMAHDHSBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.93%

3.65%

-1.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.49%

5.20%

+0.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.05%

5.70%

+2.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.21%

8.63%

+4.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.21%

8.63%

+4.58%

OMAH vs. DHSB - Expense Ratio Comparison

OMAH has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than DHSB's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

OMAH vs. DHSB - Dividend Comparison

OMAH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.44%, more than DHSB's 1.20% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


OMAH and DHSB have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DHSB has higher volatility (3.65%) compared to OMAH (1.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OMAH dropped -11.83% vs DHSB's -7.65%.

On 1-year performance, OMAH leads with 11.44% vs 9.84% for DHSB. On fees, DHSB is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, OMAH has been the lower-risk option at 1.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, OMAH has performed better with a 11.44% return vs 9.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DHSB is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for OMAH.

OMAH has the higher dividend yield at 15.44%, compared with 1.20% for DHSB.

They also come from different issuers: VistaShares and Day Hagan. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for OMAH and 0.68% for DHSB.

DHSB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OMAH and DHSB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer