OMAH vs. DHSB
OMAH (VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF) and DHSB (Day Hagan Smart Buffer ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, OMAH returned 11.44% vs 9.84% for DHSB. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. OMAH charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for DHSB.
Performance
OMAH vs. DHSB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OMAH achieves a 4.56% return, which is significantly higher than DHSB's 4.21% return.
OMAH
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 0.44%
- YTD
- 4.56%
- 6M
- 4.00%
- 1Y
- 11.44%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DHSB
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- 1.26%
- YTD
- 4.21%
- 6M
- 5.04%
- 1Y
- 9.84%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OMAH vs. DHSB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
OMAH VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF | 4.56% | 6.74% |
DHSB Day Hagan Smart Buffer ETF | 4.21% | 6.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between OMAH and DHSB is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2025 | 0.54 |
The correlation between OMAH and DHSB shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (1 year) to 0.54 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OMAH vs. DHSB — Risk / Return Rank
OMAH
DHSB
OMAH vs. DHSB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH) and Day Hagan Smart Buffer ETF (DHSB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| OMAH | DHSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.41 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.82 | 2.98 | +0.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.48 | 15.55 | -6.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OMAH | DHSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.43 | 1.74 | -0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.70 | 0.82 | -0.12 |
Drawdowns
OMAH vs. DHSB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OMAH drawdown since its inception was -11.83%, which is greater than DHSB's maximum drawdown of -7.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OMAH and DHSB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OMAH | DHSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.83% | -7.65% | -4.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.00% | -3.32% | +0.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.65% | -0.37% | -2.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.26% | -0.88% | -0.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.21% | 0.63% | +0.58% |
Volatility
OMAH vs. DHSB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH) is 1.93%, while Day Hagan Smart Buffer ETF (DHSB) has a volatility of 3.65%. This indicates that OMAH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DHSB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OMAH | DHSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.93% | 3.65% | -1.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.49% | 5.20% | +0.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.05% | 5.70% | +2.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.21% | 8.63% | +4.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.21% | 8.63% | +4.58% |
OMAH vs. DHSB - Expense Ratio Comparison
OMAH has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than DHSB's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
OMAH vs. DHSB - Dividend Comparison
OMAH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.44%, more than DHSB's 1.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
DHSB Day Hagan Smart Buffer ETF | 1.20% | 1.25% |
OMAH VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF | 15.44% | 12.86% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OMAH and DHSB have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DHSB has higher volatility (3.65%) compared to OMAH (1.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OMAH dropped -11.83% vs DHSB's -7.65%.
On 1-year performance, OMAH leads with 11.44% vs 9.84% for DHSB. On fees, DHSB is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, OMAH has been the lower-risk option at 1.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, OMAH has performed better with a 11.44% return vs 9.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DHSB is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for OMAH.
OMAH has the higher dividend yield at 15.44%, compared with 1.20% for DHSB.
They also come from different issuers: VistaShares and Day Hagan. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for OMAH and 0.68% for DHSB.
DHSB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OMAH and DHSB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer