PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OMAH vs. BUYW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OMAH vs. BUYW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH) and Main Buywrite ETF (BUYW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OMAH achieves a 4.56% return, which is significantly higher than BUYW's 3.39% return.


OMAH

1D
-0.70%
1M
0.44%
YTD
4.56%
6M
4.00%
1Y
11.44%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BUYW

1D
0.35%
1M
0.99%
YTD
3.39%
6M
4.27%
1Y
9.76%
3Y*
8.73%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OMAH vs. BUYW - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between OMAH and BUYW is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2025

0.52

The correlation between OMAH and BUYW shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (1 year) to 0.52 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

OMAH vs. BUYW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
OMAH
BUYW

Financial Services

38.9%
15.3%

Consumer Defensive

16.2%
3.2%

Technology

13.6%
24.0%

Energy

10.5%
13.6%

Communication Services

9.8%
16.9%

Healthcare

7.0%
13.0%

Consumer Cyclical

4.1%
6.4%

Basic Materials

-

1.0%

Industrials

-

4.4%

Real Estate

-

1.0%

Utilities

-

1.3%

Financial Services

OMAH
38.9%
BUYW
15.3%

Consumer Defensive

OMAH
16.2%
BUYW
3.2%

Technology

OMAH
13.6%
BUYW
24.0%

Energy

OMAH
10.5%
BUYW
13.6%

Communication Services

OMAH
9.8%
BUYW
16.9%

Healthcare

OMAH
7.0%
BUYW
13.0%

Consumer Cyclical

OMAH
4.1%
BUYW
6.4%

Basic Materials

OMAH

-

BUYW
1.0%

Industrials

OMAH

-

BUYW
4.4%

Real Estate

OMAH

-

BUYW
1.0%

Utilities

OMAH

-

BUYW
1.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OMAH vs. BUYW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OMAH
OMAH Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
OMAH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OMAH Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
OMAH Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
OMAH Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
OMAH Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

BUYW
BUYW Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
BUYW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUYW Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUYW Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
BUYW Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUYW Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OMAH vs. BUYW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH) and Main Buywrite ETF (BUYW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


OMAHBUYWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.40

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.82

3.79

+0.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.48

20.24

-10.76

OMAH vs. BUYW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OMAH Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is comparable to the BUYW Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OMAH and BUYW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


OMAHBUYWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.43

2.03

-0.60

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.70

1.17

-0.46

Drawdowns

OMAH vs. BUYW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OMAH drawdown since its inception was -11.83%, which is greater than BUYW's maximum drawdown of -9.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OMAH and BUYW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OMAHBUYWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.83%

-9.36%

-2.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.00%

-2.59%

-0.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.65%

-0.21%

-2.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.26%

-0.61%

-0.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.21%

0.48%

+0.73%

Volatility

OMAH vs. BUYW - Volatility Comparison

VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH) has a higher volatility of 1.93% compared to Main Buywrite ETF (BUYW) at 1.02%. This indicates that OMAH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BUYW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OMAHBUYWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.93%

1.02%

+0.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.49%

4.03%

+1.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.05%

4.85%

+3.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.21%

8.47%

+4.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.21%

8.47%

+4.74%

OMAH vs. BUYW - Expense Ratio Comparison

OMAH has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than BUYW's 1.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

OMAH vs. BUYW - Dividend Comparison

OMAH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.44%, more than BUYW's 5.91% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
BUYW
Main Buywrite ETF
5.91%5.89%5.93%5.95%0.50%
OMAH
VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF
15.44%12.86%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


OMAH and BUYW have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OMAH has higher volatility (1.93%) compared to BUYW (1.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OMAH dropped -11.83% vs BUYW's -9.36%.

On 1-year performance, OMAH leads with 11.44% vs 9.76% for BUYW. On fees, OMAH is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, BUYW has been the lower-risk option at 1.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, OMAH has performed better with a 11.44% return vs 9.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

OMAH is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for BUYW.

OMAH has the higher dividend yield at 15.44%, compared with 5.91% for BUYW.

They also come from different issuers: VistaShares and Main Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for OMAH and 1.29% for BUYW.

BUYW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OMAH and BUYW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer