PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OM3Y.DE vs. H4Z3.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OM3Y.DE vs. H4Z3.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares MSCI EM IMI Screened UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (OM3Y.DE) and HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (H4Z3.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OM3Y.DE achieves a 27.24% return, which is significantly higher than H4Z3.DE's 25.10% return.


OM3Y.DE

1D
2.31%
1M
-0.96%
6M
24.29%
YTD
27.24%
1Y
43.57%
3Y*
19.94%
5Y*
8.21%
10Y*

H4Z3.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
-3.70%
6M
22.51%
YTD
25.10%
1Y
42.87%
3Y*
19.25%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OM3Y.DE vs. H4Z3.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
OM3Y.DE
iShares MSCI EM IMI Screened UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
27.24%17.76%13.99%6.72%-5.99%
H4Z3.DE
HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
25.10%18.60%13.73%4.66%-5.78%

Correlation

The correlation between OM3Y.DE and H4Z3.DE is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2022

0.97

The correlation between OM3Y.DE and H4Z3.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OM3Y.DE vs. H4Z3.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OM3Y.DE
OM3Y.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
OM3Y.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OM3Y.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
OM3Y.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
OM3Y.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
OM3Y.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

H4Z3.DE
H4Z3.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
H4Z3.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
H4Z3.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
H4Z3.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
H4Z3.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
H4Z3.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OM3Y.DE vs. H4Z3.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EM IMI Screened UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (OM3Y.DE) and HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (H4Z3.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


OM3Y.DEH4Z3.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

0.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.40

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.89

4.11

-0.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.16

13.45

-0.29

OM3Y.DE vs. H4Z3.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OM3Y.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.22, which is comparable to the H4Z3.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OM3Y.DE and H4Z3.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

OM3Y.DE vs. H4Z3.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OM3Y.DE drawdown since its inception was -31.70%, which is greater than H4Z3.DE's maximum drawdown of -18.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OM3Y.DE and H4Z3.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OM3Y.DEH4Z3.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.70%

-18.86%

-12.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.16%

-10.47%

-0.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.59%

-18.86%

-0.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.55%

-7.16%

+2.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.72%

-4.93%

-3.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.30%

3.20%

+0.10%

Volatility

OM3Y.DE vs. H4Z3.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI EM IMI Screened UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (OM3Y.DE) and HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (H4Z3.DE) have volatilities of 9.28% and 9.16%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OM3Y.DEH4Z3.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.28%

9.16%

+0.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.14%

17.05%

+0.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.60%

19.45%

+0.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.02%

16.24%

+0.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.51%

16.24%

+3.27%

OM3Y.DE vs. H4Z3.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

OM3Y.DE has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than H4Z3.DE's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

OM3Y.DE vs. H4Z3.DE - Dividend Comparison

OM3Y.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%, while H4Z3.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
H4Z3.DE
HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
OM3Y.DE
iShares MSCI EM IMI Screened UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
1.61%1.98%2.33%2.35%2.59%1.82%1.58%2.23%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, OM3Y.DE and H4Z3.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, H4Z3.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

H4Z3.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for OM3Y.DE.

OM3Y.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets IMI Screened Index, while H4Z3.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets. They also come from different issuers: iShares and HSBC. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for OM3Y.DE and 0.15% for H4Z3.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OM3Y.DE and H4Z3.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer