OKTG vs. BSMQ
OKTG (Leverage Shares 2X Long OKTA Daily ETF) and BSMQ (Invesco BulletShares 2026 Municipal Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - OKTG is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Leverage Shares, while BSMQ is a Municipal Bonds fund tracking the Invesco BulletShares Municipal Bond 2026 Index. OKTG is actively managed, while BSMQ is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.12, they often move in opposite directions. OKTG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for BSMQ.
Performance
OKTG vs. BSMQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OKTG achieves a 55.43% return, which is significantly higher than BSMQ's 0.81% return.
OKTG
- 1D
- -1.63%
- 1M
- 126.83%
- YTD
- 55.43%
- 6M
- 55.38%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BSMQ
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 0.17%
- YTD
- 0.81%
- 6M
- 1.18%
- 1Y
- 2.98%
- 3Y*
- 2.90%
- 5Y*
- 0.31%
- 10Y*
- —
OKTG vs. BSMQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
OKTG Leverage Shares 2X Long OKTA Daily ETF | 55.43% | 10.38% |
BSMQ Invesco BulletShares 2026 Municipal Bond ETF | 0.81% | 0.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between OKTG and BSMQ is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025 | -0.12 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OKTG vs. BSMQ — Risk / Return Rank
OKTG
BSMQ
OKTG vs. BSMQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long OKTA Daily ETF (OKTG) and Invesco BulletShares 2026 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OKTG | BSMQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.26 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.12 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.26 | 0.25 | +1.01 |
Drawdowns
OKTG vs. BSMQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OKTG drawdown since its inception was -60.69%, which is greater than BSMQ's maximum drawdown of -13.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OKTG and BSMQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OKTG | BSMQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.69% | -13.18% | -47.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.33% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -2.53% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -11.50% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.19% | -0.05% | -23.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.37% | -3.47% | -19.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.12% | — |
Volatility
OKTG vs. BSMQ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OKTG | BSMQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.40% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.94% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 137.13% | 1.33% | +135.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 137.13% | 2.68% | +134.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 137.13% | 4.79% | +132.34% |
OKTG vs. BSMQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
OKTG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than BSMQ's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
OKTG vs. BSMQ - Dividend Comparison
OKTG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BSMQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.76%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSMQ Invesco BulletShares 2026 Municipal Bond ETF | 2.76% | 2.74% | 2.75% | 2.47% | 1.60% | 1.14% | 1.57% | 0.44% |
OKTG Leverage Shares 2X Long OKTA Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OKTG and BSMQ have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BSMQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BSMQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for OKTG.
BSMQ has the higher dividend yield at 2.76%, compared with 0.00% for OKTG.
OKTG is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while BSMQ is Municipal Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for OKTG and 0.18% for BSMQ.
Find the right allocation for OKTG and BSMQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer