OKMUX vs. DFSMX
Compare and contrast key facts about Oklahoma Municipal Fund (OKMUX) and DFA Short Term Municipal Bond Portfolio (DFSMX).
OKMUX is managed by IntegrityVikingFunds. It was launched on Sep 24, 1996. DFSMX is managed by Dimensional. It was launched on Aug 19, 2002.
Performance
OKMUX vs. DFSMX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
OKMUX vs. DFSMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OKMUX Oklahoma Municipal Fund | -0.81% | 4.78% | -0.51% | 4.94% | -10.69% | 0.90% | 3.74% | 6.00% | 0.53% | 3.93% |
DFSMX DFA Short Term Municipal Bond Portfolio | 0.55% | 2.30% | 2.84% | 2.98% | -0.36% | -0.11% | 0.83% | 1.62% | 1.22% | 1.15% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OKMUX achieves a -0.81% return, which is significantly lower than DFSMX's 0.55% return. Over the past 10 years, OKMUX has underperformed DFSMX with an annualized return of 1.01%, while DFSMX has yielded a comparatively higher 1.23% annualized return.
OKMUX
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- -2.70%
- YTD
- -0.81%
- 6M
- 1.45%
- 1Y
- 4.42%
- 3Y*
- 1.94%
- 5Y*
- -0.18%
- 10Y*
- 1.01%
DFSMX
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- -0.05%
- YTD
- 0.55%
- 6M
- 1.10%
- 1Y
- 2.45%
- 3Y*
- 2.60%
- 5Y*
- 1.63%
- 10Y*
- 1.23%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
OKMUX vs. DFSMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
OKMUX has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than DFSMX's 0.20% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
OKMUX vs. DFSMX — Risk / Return Rank
OKMUX
DFSMX
OKMUX vs. DFSMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Oklahoma Municipal Fund (OKMUX) and DFA Short Term Municipal Bond Portfolio (DFSMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| OKMUX | DFSMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.80 | 3.68 | -2.88 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.15 | 6.50 | -5.35 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 3.20 | -1.89 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.84 | 4.59 | -3.75 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.16 | 21.83 | -18.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OKMUX | DFSMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 | 3.68 | -2.88 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.04 | 2.11 | -2.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.24 | 1.60 | -1.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | 1.78 | -1.17 |
Correlation
The correlation between OKMUX and DFSMX is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
OKMUX vs. DFSMX - Dividend Comparison
OKMUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.96%, more than DFSMX's 2.43% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OKMUX Oklahoma Municipal Fund | 2.96% | 3.18% | 3.01% | 2.32% | 1.85% | 1.39% | 1.73% | 2.55% | 2.41% | 2.47% | 2.43% | 2.22% |
DFSMX DFA Short Term Municipal Bond Portfolio | 2.43% | 2.08% | 2.80% | 1.94% | 0.63% | 0.19% | 0.83% | 1.22% | 1.11% | 0.95% | 0.94% | 0.95% |
Drawdowns
OKMUX vs. DFSMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OKMUX drawdown since its inception was -16.68%, which is greater than DFSMX's maximum drawdown of -2.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OKMUX and DFSMX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| OKMUX | DFSMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.68% | -2.66% | -14.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.10% | -0.39% | -5.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.39% | -1.67% | -13.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -15.39% | -1.69% | -13.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.48% | -0.06% | -3.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.53% | -0.24% | -2.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.62% | 0.10% | +1.52% |
Volatility
OKMUX vs. DFSMX - Volatility Comparison
Oklahoma Municipal Fund (OKMUX) has a higher volatility of 1.01% compared to DFA Short Term Municipal Bond Portfolio (DFSMX) at 0.11%. This indicates that OKMUX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFSMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| OKMUX | DFSMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.01% | 0.11% | +0.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.64% | 0.37% | +1.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.30% | 0.68% | +5.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.46% | 0.78% | +3.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.13% | 0.77% | +3.36% |