PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OKLL vs. IWMY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OKLL vs. IWMY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Daily Target 2x Long OKLO ETF (OKLL) and Defiance R2000 Weekly Distribution ETF (IWMY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OKLL achieves a -75.01% return, which is significantly lower than IWMY's 14.09% return.


OKLL

1D
-1.87%
1M
-31.54%
6M
-87.92%
YTD
-75.01%
1Y
-78.88%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IWMY

1D
-0.63%
1M
0.35%
6M
8.85%
YTD
14.09%
1Y
18.08%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OKLL vs. IWMY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between OKLL and IWMY is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2025

0.54

The correlation between OKLL and IWMY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OKLL vs. IWMY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OKLL
OKLL Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
OKLL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OKLL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
OKLL Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
OKLL Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
OKLL Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

IWMY
IWMY Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
IWMY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWMY Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWMY Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
IWMY Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWMY Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OKLL vs. IWMY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2x Long OKLO ETF (OKLL) and Defiance R2000 Weekly Distribution ETF (IWMY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


OKLLIWMYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.20

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.81

1.57

-2.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.06

5.12

-6.18

OKLL vs. IWMY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OKLL Sharpe Ratio is -0.39, which is lower than the IWMY Sharpe Ratio of 1.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OKLL and IWMY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

OKLL vs. IWMY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OKLL drawdown since its inception was -97.15%, which is greater than IWMY's maximum drawdown of -18.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OKLL and IWMY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OKLLIWMYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.15%

-18.72%

-78.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-97.15%

-11.57%

-85.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-96.98%

-2.00%

-94.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-63.96%

-2.90%

-61.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

74.15%

3.54%

+70.61%

Volatility

OKLL vs. IWMY - Volatility Comparison

Defiance Daily Target 2x Long OKLO ETF (OKLL) has a higher volatility of 37.92% compared to Defiance R2000 Weekly Distribution ETF (IWMY) at 4.44%. This indicates that OKLL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWMY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OKLLIWMYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

37.92%

4.44%

+33.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

130.96%

13.48%

+117.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

202.13%

16.33%

+185.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

199.81%

15.85%

+183.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

199.81%

15.85%

+183.96%

OKLL vs. IWMY - Expense Ratio Comparison

OKLL has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than IWMY's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

OKLL vs. IWMY - Dividend Comparison

OKLL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IWMY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 42.85%.


PositionTTM202520242023
IWMY
Defiance R2000 Weekly Distribution ETF
42.85%63.33%107.92%11.34%
OKLL
Defiance Daily Target 2x Long OKLO ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


OKLL and IWMY have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OKLL has higher volatility (37.92%) compared to IWMY (4.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OKLL dropped -97.15% vs IWMY's -18.72%.

On 1-year performance, IWMY leads with 18.08% vs -78.88% for OKLL. On fees, IWMY is cheaper at 1.05% per year. On volatility, IWMY has been the lower-risk option at 4.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, IWMY has performed better with a 18.08% return vs -78.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IWMY is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for OKLL.

IWMY has the higher dividend yield at 42.85%, compared with 0.00% for OKLL.

OKLL is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while IWMY is Options Trading. Their fees differ too: 1.31% for OKLL and 1.05% for IWMY.

IWMY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.11 vs -0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OKLL and IWMY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer