PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OKLL vs. IBID
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OKLL vs. IBID - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Daily Target 2x Long OKLO ETF (OKLL) and iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OKLL achieves a -78.06% return, which is significantly lower than IBID's 2.35% return.


OKLL

1D
-12.17%
1M
-39.87%
6M
-88.76%
YTD
-78.06%
1Y
-81.45%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IBID

1D
0.06%
1M
-0.06%
6M
2.28%
YTD
2.35%
1Y
3.98%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OKLL vs. IBID - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between OKLL and IBID is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2025

-0.16

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OKLL vs. IBID — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OKLL
OKLL Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
OKLL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OKLL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
OKLL Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
OKLL Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
OKLL Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

IBID
IBID Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
IBID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBID Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBID Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
IBID Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBID Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OKLL vs. IBID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2x Long OKLO ETF (OKLL) and iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


OKLLIBIDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-5.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.72

-0.70

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.84

7.26

-8.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.09

25.39

-26.49

OKLL vs. IBID - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OKLL Sharpe Ratio is -0.40, which is lower than the IBID Sharpe Ratio of 3.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OKLL and IBID, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

OKLL vs. IBID - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OKLL drawdown since its inception was -97.35%, which is greater than IBID's maximum drawdown of -1.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OKLL and IBID.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OKLLIBIDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.35%

-1.28%

-96.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-97.35%

-0.55%

-96.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-97.35%

-0.14%

-97.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-64.09%

-0.23%

-63.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

74.40%

0.16%

+74.24%

Volatility

OKLL vs. IBID - Volatility Comparison

Defiance Daily Target 2x Long OKLO ETF (OKLL) has a higher volatility of 38.91% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID) at 0.39%. This indicates that OKLL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OKLLIBIDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

38.91%

0.39%

+38.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

131.45%

0.90%

+130.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

202.81%

1.24%

+201.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

199.80%

2.23%

+197.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

199.80%

2.23%

+197.57%

OKLL vs. IBID - Expense Ratio Comparison

OKLL has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than IBID's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

OKLL vs. IBID - Dividend Comparison

OKLL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IBID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.90%.


PositionTTM202520242023
IBID
iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF
4.90%4.43%4.24%0.81%
OKLL
Defiance Daily Target 2x Long OKLO ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


OKLL and IBID have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OKLL has higher volatility (38.91%) compared to IBID (0.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OKLL dropped -97.35% vs IBID's -1.28%.

On 1-year performance, IBID leads with 3.98% vs -81.45% for OKLL. On fees, IBID is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBID has been the lower-risk option at 0.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, IBID has performed better with a 3.98% return vs -81.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBID is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for OKLL.

IBID has the higher dividend yield at 4.90%, compared with 0.00% for OKLL.

OKLL is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while IBID is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Defiance and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.31% for OKLL and 0.10% for IBID.

IBID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.23 vs -0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OKLL and IBID

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer