PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OILT vs. ION
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

OILT vs. ION - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Texas Capital Texas Oil Index ETF (OILT) and Proshares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF (ION). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

OILT vs. ION - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
OILT
Texas Capital Texas Oil Index ETF
44.81%-3.30%0.87%-0.16%
ION
Proshares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF
9.49%108.37%-20.02%3.39%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OILT achieves a 44.81% return, which is significantly higher than ION's 9.49% return.


OILT

1D
-1.68%
1M
17.56%
YTD
44.81%
6M
44.96%
1Y
38.48%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ION

1D
2.98%
1M
-12.58%
YTD
9.49%
6M
46.23%
1Y
124.76%
3Y*
16.44%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


OILT vs. ION - Expense Ratio Comparison

OILT has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than ION's 0.58% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

OILT vs. ION — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OILT
OILT Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
OILT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OILT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
OILT Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
OILT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
OILT Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

ION
ION Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
ION Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ION Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
ION Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
ION Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
ION Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OILT vs. ION - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Texas Capital Texas Oil Index ETF (OILT) and Proshares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF (ION). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


OILTIONDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.12

3.21

-2.09

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.58

3.47

-1.89

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.47

-0.25

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.64

5.26

-3.62

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.58

20.19

-15.62

OILT vs. ION - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OILT Sharpe Ratio is 1.12, which is lower than the ION Sharpe Ratio of 3.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OILT and ION, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


OILTIONDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.12

3.21

-2.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.37

+0.21

Correlation

The correlation between OILT and ION is 0.21, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

OILT vs. ION - Dividend Comparison

OILT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.27%, more than ION's 1.46% yield.


TTM2025202420232022
OILT
Texas Capital Texas Oil Index ETF
2.27%3.12%2.63%0.00%0.00%
ION
Proshares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF
1.46%1.63%1.74%2.23%0.13%

Drawdowns

OILT vs. ION - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OILT drawdown since its inception was -35.21%, smaller than the maximum ION drawdown of -52.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OILT and ION.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


OILTIONDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.21%

-52.08%

+16.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.58%

-23.30%

-1.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.28%

-13.04%

+10.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.25%

-24.61%

+11.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.83%

6.07%

+2.76%

Volatility

OILT vs. ION - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Texas Capital Texas Oil Index ETF (OILT) is 6.20%, while Proshares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF (ION) has a volatility of 15.13%. This indicates that OILT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ION based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


OILTIONDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.20%

15.13%

-8.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.58%

30.44%

-11.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34.47%

39.07%

-4.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.31%

30.74%

-2.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.31%

30.74%

-2.43%