OILGX vs. WMGAX

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

OILGX (Optimum Large Cap Growth Fund) and WMGAX (Delaware Ivy Mid Cap Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - OILGX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Delaware Funds, while WMGAX is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Delaware Funds. Over the past 10 years, OILGX returned 16.89%/yr vs 11.00%/yr for WMGAX. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. OILGX charges 0.89%/yr vs 1.12%/yr for WMGAX.

Performance

OILGX vs. WMGAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Optimum Large Cap Growth Fund (OILGX) and Delaware Ivy Mid Cap Growth Fund (WMGAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OILGX achieves a 6.51% return, which is significantly higher than WMGAX's 1.49% return. Over the past 10 years, OILGX has outperformed WMGAX with an annualized return of 16.89%, while WMGAX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.00% annualized return.

OILGX

• 1D: 1.15%
• 1M: -0.45%
• 6M: 6.43%
• YTD: 6.51%
• 1Y: 17.79%
• 3Y*: 25.50%
• 5Y*: 12.36%
• 10Y*: 16.89%

WMGAX

• 1D: 0.35%
• 1M: -2.69%
• 6M: -2.19%
• YTD: 1.49%
• 1Y: -0.09%
• 3Y*: 3.89%
• 5Y*: -0.25%
• 10Y*: 11.00%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OILGX vs. WMGAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
OILGX Optimum Large Cap Growth Fund	6.51%	15.97%	49.90%	41.16%	-34.69%	17.88%	33.81%	31.34%	-0.80%	32.46%
WMGAX Delaware Ivy Mid Cap Growth Fund	1.49%	0.83%	10.02%	19.97%	-30.68%	16.22%	48.56%	38.01%	-0.20%	26.95%

Correlation

The correlation between OILGX and WMGAX is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.69
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.73
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.83
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.85
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2003	0.89

Over the past year, the correlation between OILGX and WMGAX has dropped to 0.69 - well below their long-term average of 0.89, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

OILGX vs. WMGAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OILGX

OILGX Risk / Return Rank: 23
OILGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
OILGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
OILGX Omega Ratio Rank: 24
OILGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
OILGX Martin Ratio Rank: 22

WMGAX

WMGAX Risk / Return Rank: 3
WMGAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
WMGAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
WMGAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3
WMGAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
WMGAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OILGX vs. WMGAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Optimum Large Cap Growth Fund (OILGX) and Delaware Ivy Mid Cap Growth Fund (WMGAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	OILGX	WMGAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.06	-0.06	+1.12
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.52	0.04	+1.48
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.00	+0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.19	-0.07	+1.25
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.93	-0.18	+4.11

OILGX vs. WMGAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OILGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.06, which is higher than the WMGAX Sharpe Ratio of -0.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OILGX and WMGAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

OILGX vs. WMGAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OILGX drawdown since its inception was -54.28%, roughly equal to the maximum WMGAX drawdown of -53.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OILGX and WMGAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	OILGX	WMGAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-54.28%	-53.74%	-0.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.31%	-16.16%	+0.85%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.75%	-26.59%	+2.84%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-39.97%	-42.95%	+2.98%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.97%	-42.95%	+2.98%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.50%	-15.86%	+12.36%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.46%	-13.62%	+5.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.62%	6.02%	-1.40%

Volatility

OILGX vs. WMGAX - Volatility Comparison

Optimum Large Cap Growth Fund (OILGX) has a higher volatility of 5.63% compared to Delaware Ivy Mid Cap Growth Fund (WMGAX) at 4.30%. This indicates that OILGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WMGAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	OILGX	WMGAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.63%	4.30%	+1.33%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.45%	13.90%	-0.45%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.14%	17.92%	-0.78%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.59%	25.17%	-1.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.07%	23.14%	-1.07%

OILGX vs. WMGAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

OILGX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is lower than WMGAX's 1.12% expense ratio.

Dividends

OILGX vs. WMGAX - Dividend Comparison

OILGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.19%, more than WMGAX's 10.93% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
OILGX Optimum Large Cap Growth Fund	13.19%	14.05%	20.62%	11.50%	4.95%	14.42%	7.72%	2.98%	14.76%	18.13%	3.68%	10.49%
WMGAX Delaware Ivy Mid Cap Growth Fund	10.93%	11.10%	15.30%	6.66%	11.94%	13.08%	9.97%	5.23%	10.28%	7.92%	3.98%	10.88%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both OILGX and WMGAX in my portfolio?

OILGX and WMGAX have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, OILGX or WMGAX?

OILGX has higher volatility (5.63%) compared to WMGAX (4.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OILGX dropped -54.28% vs WMGAX's -53.74%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

OILGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.06 vs -0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.