OILGX vs. FGINX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

OILGX (Optimum Large Cap Growth Fund) and FGINX (Delaware Growth and Income Fund) are both mutual funds - OILGX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Delaware Funds, while FGINX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund managed by Delaware Funds. Over the past 10 years, OILGX returned 17.22%/yr vs 13.34%/yr for FGINX. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. OILGX charges 0.89%/yr vs 1.02%/yr for FGINX.

Performance

OILGX vs. FGINX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Optimum Large Cap Growth Fund (OILGX) and Delaware Growth and Income Fund (FGINX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OILGX achieves a 8.48% return, which is significantly lower than FGINX's 17.72% return. Over the past 10 years, OILGX has outperformed FGINX with an annualized return of 17.22%, while FGINX has yielded a comparatively lower 13.34% annualized return.

OILGX

• 1D: -1.42%
• 1M: 5.02%
• YTD: 8.48%
• 6M: 7.29%
• 1Y: 25.50%
• 3Y*: 28.93%
• 5Y*: 14.12%
• 10Y*: 17.22%

FGINX

• 1D: -0.15%
• 1M: 5.61%
• YTD: 17.72%
• 6M: 22.19%
• 1Y: 44.56%
• 3Y*: 26.37%
• 5Y*: 16.14%
• 10Y*: 13.34%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OILGX vs. FGINX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
OILGX Optimum Large Cap Growth Fund	8.48%	15.97%	49.90%	41.16%	-34.69%	17.88%	33.81%	31.34%	-0.80%	32.46%
FGINX Delaware Growth and Income Fund	17.72%	29.78%	15.13%	11.98%	3.03%	21.37%	-0.08%	25.64%	-10.27%	18.08%

Correlation

The correlation between OILGX and FGINX is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.53
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.52
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.59
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.64
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2003	0.81

Over the past year, the correlation between OILGX and FGINX has dropped to 0.53 - well below their long-term average of 0.81, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

OILGX vs. FGINX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OILGX

OILGX Risk / Return Rank: 28
OILGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
OILGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
OILGX Omega Ratio Rank: 30
OILGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
OILGX Martin Ratio Rank: 25

FGINX

FGINX Risk / Return Rank: 95
FGINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
FGINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
FGINX Omega Ratio Rank: 92
FGINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
FGINX Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OILGX vs. FGINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Optimum Large Cap Growth Fund (OILGX) and Delaware Growth and Income Fund (FGINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	OILGX	FGINX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.63	3.92	-2.29
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.24	5.41	-3.17
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.71	-0.42
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.71	6.07	-4.35
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.04	23.16	-17.12
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

OILGX vs. FGINX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OILGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is lower than the FGINX Sharpe Ratio of 3.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OILGX and FGINX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	OILGX	FGINX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.63	3.92	-2.29
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.61	1.09	-0.48
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.78	0.79	0.00
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.59	0.55	+0.04

Drawdowns

OILGX vs. FGINX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OILGX drawdown since its inception was -54.28%, roughly equal to the maximum FGINX drawdown of -54.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OILGX and FGINX.

Drawdown Indicators

	OILGX	FGINX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-54.28%	-54.80%	+0.52%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.31%	-7.34%	-7.97%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.75%	-13.28%	-10.47%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-39.97%	-16.21%	-23.76%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.97%	-37.37%	-2.60%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.71%	-0.15%	-1.56%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.48%	-9.70%	+1.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.33%	1.91%	+2.42%

Volatility

OILGX vs. FGINX - Volatility Comparison

Optimum Large Cap Growth Fund (OILGX) has a higher volatility of 4.02% compared to Delaware Growth and Income Fund (FGINX) at 2.79%. This indicates that OILGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FGINX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	OILGX	FGINX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.02%	2.79%	+1.23%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.11%	8.23%	+3.88%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.10%	11.36%	+4.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.41%	14.88%	+8.53%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.04%	17.03%	+5.01%

OILGX vs. FGINX - Expense Ratio Comparison

OILGX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is lower than FGINX's 1.02% expense ratio.

Dividends

OILGX vs. FGINX - Dividend Comparison

OILGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.95%, more than FGINX's 9.65% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FGINX Delaware Growth and Income Fund	9.65%	11.28%	12.40%	7.11%	7.04%	11.97%	6.59%	51.75%	25.36%	5.13%	4.12%	5.66%
OILGX Optimum Large Cap Growth Fund	12.95%	14.05%	20.62%	11.50%	4.95%	14.42%	7.72%	2.98%	14.76%	18.13%	3.68%	10.49%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both OILGX and FGINX in my portfolio?

OILGX and FGINX have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, OILGX or FGINX?

OILGX has higher volatility (4.02%) compared to FGINX (2.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OILGX dropped -54.28% vs FGINX's -54.80%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FGINX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.92 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.