OILGX vs. CXHYX
Compare and contrast key facts about Optimum Large Cap Growth Fund (OILGX) and Delaware National High-Yield Municipal Bond Fund (CXHYX).
OILGX is managed by Delaware Funds. It was launched on Aug 1, 2003. CXHYX is managed by Delaware Funds. It was launched on Sep 21, 1986.
Performance
OILGX vs. CXHYX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
OILGX vs. CXHYX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OILGX Optimum Large Cap Growth Fund | -8.52% | 15.97% | 49.90% | 41.16% | -34.69% | 17.88% | 33.81% | 31.34% | -0.80% | 32.46% |
CXHYX Delaware National High-Yield Municipal Bond Fund | -0.46% | 1.71% | 5.76% | 8.26% | -14.85% | 7.86% | 6.49% | 11.52% | 1.58% | 10.15% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OILGX achieves a -8.52% return, which is significantly lower than CXHYX's -0.46% return. Over the past 10 years, OILGX has outperformed CXHYX with an annualized return of 15.36%, while CXHYX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.39% annualized return.
OILGX
- 1D
- 3.93%
- 1M
- -5.44%
- YTD
- -8.52%
- 6M
- -7.46%
- 1Y
- 17.75%
- 3Y*
- 25.17%
- 5Y*
- 11.11%
- 10Y*
- 15.36%
CXHYX
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- -2.04%
- YTD
- -0.46%
- 6M
- -0.10%
- 1Y
- 0.02%
- 3Y*
- 4.14%
- 5Y*
- 1.00%
- 10Y*
- 3.39%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
OILGX vs. CXHYX - Expense Ratio Comparison
OILGX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than CXHYX's 0.85% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
OILGX vs. CXHYX — Risk / Return Rank
OILGX
CXHYX
OILGX vs. CXHYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Optimum Large Cap Growth Fund (OILGX) and Delaware National High-Yield Municipal Bond Fund (CXHYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| OILGX | CXHYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.82 | 0.07 | +0.75 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.33 | 0.14 | +1.19 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.03 | +0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.22 | 0.26 | +0.96 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.29 | 0.62 | +3.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OILGX | CXHYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 | 0.07 | +0.75 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 | 0.17 | +0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 | 0.59 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 1.17 | -0.62 |
Correlation
The correlation between OILGX and CXHYX is -0.06. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
OILGX vs. CXHYX - Dividend Comparison
OILGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.36%, more than CXHYX's 4.96% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OILGX Optimum Large Cap Growth Fund | 15.36% | 14.05% | 20.62% | 11.50% | 4.95% | 14.42% | 7.72% | 2.98% | 14.76% | 18.13% | 3.68% | 10.49% |
CXHYX Delaware National High-Yield Municipal Bond Fund | 4.96% | 6.41% | 5.43% | 3.99% | 4.94% | 3.61% | 4.42% | 5.27% | 4.92% | 4.98% | 3.87% | 3.77% |
Drawdowns
OILGX vs. CXHYX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OILGX drawdown since its inception was -54.28%, which is greater than CXHYX's maximum drawdown of -21.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OILGX and CXHYX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| OILGX | CXHYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.28% | -21.82% | -32.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.31% | -6.90% | -8.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.97% | -20.11% | -19.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.97% | -20.11% | -19.86% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.99% | -2.44% | -9.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.52% | -2.59% | -5.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.37% | 2.94% | +1.43% |
Volatility
OILGX vs. CXHYX - Volatility Comparison
Optimum Large Cap Growth Fund (OILGX) has a higher volatility of 6.96% compared to Delaware National High-Yield Municipal Bond Fund (CXHYX) at 1.55%. This indicates that OILGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CXHYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| OILGX | CXHYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.96% | 1.55% | +5.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.08% | 2.43% | +10.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.88% | 7.26% | +15.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.41% | 6.03% | +17.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.00% | 5.78% | +16.22% |