PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OFS vs. GLAD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

OFS vs. GLAD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in OFS Capital Corporation (OFS) and Gladstone Capital Corporation (GLAD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OFS achieves a -22.91% return, which is significantly lower than GLAD's -7.00% return. Over the past 10 years, OFS has underperformed GLAD with an annualized return of -1.09%, while GLAD has yielded a comparatively higher 12.17% annualized return.


OFS

1D
-8.79%
1M
2.36%
YTD
-22.91%
6M
-19.35%
1Y
-53.94%
3Y*
-19.16%
5Y*
-8.13%
10Y*
-1.09%

GLAD

1D
-1.23%
1M
-2.59%
YTD
-7.00%
6M
-5.72%
1Y
-24.17%
3Y*
8.76%
5Y*
4.59%
10Y*
12.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OFS vs. GLAD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
OFS
OFS Capital Corporation
-22.91%-31.59%-20.19%29.93%3.28%66.92%-25.16%17.95%-0.24%-4.40%
GLAD
Gladstone Capital Corporation
-7.00%-21.14%46.99%22.71%-10.43%40.50%-0.69%48.58%-13.07%7.05%

Correlation

The correlation between OFS and GLAD is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2012

0.24

Fundamentals

Market Cap

OFS:

$44.48M

GLAD:

$523.62M

EPS

OFS:

-$2.79

GLAD:

$1.09

PB Ratio

OFS:

0.41

GLAD:

1.08

Total Revenue (TTM)

OFS:

-$11.87M

GLAD:

$66.59M

Gross Profit (TTM)

OFS:

-$26.47M

GLAD:

$28.95M

EBITDA (TTM)

OFS:

-$33.16M

GLAD:

$27.90M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OFS vs. GLAD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OFS
OFS Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
OFS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OFS Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
OFS Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
OFS Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
OFS Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

GLAD
GLAD Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
GLAD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLAD Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLAD Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
GLAD Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLAD Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OFS vs. GLAD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for OFS Capital Corporation (OFS) and Gladstone Capital Corporation (GLAD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


OFSGLADDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.77

0.85

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.84

-0.62

-0.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.38

-0.93

-0.45

OFS vs. GLAD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OFS Sharpe Ratio is -1.09, which is comparable to the GLAD Sharpe Ratio of -0.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OFS and GLAD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

OFS vs. GLAD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OFS drawdown since its inception was -69.09%, smaller than the maximum GLAD drawdown of -74.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OFS and GLAD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OFSGLADDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.09%

-74.87%

+5.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-64.17%

-39.22%

-24.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-66.97%

-39.59%

-27.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-66.97%

-39.59%

-27.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-69.09%

-58.37%

-10.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-59.07%

-31.52%

-27.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.48%

-18.72%

+4.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

39.03%

25.91%

+13.12%

Volatility

OFS vs. GLAD - Volatility Comparison

OFS Capital Corporation (OFS) has a higher volatility of 15.88% compared to Gladstone Capital Corporation (GLAD) at 6.72%. This indicates that OFS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLAD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OFSGLADDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.88%

6.72%

+9.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

40.96%

19.27%

+21.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

49.52%

25.72%

+23.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.22%

23.64%

+10.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.40%

30.05%

+10.35%

Dividends

OFS vs. GLAD - Dividend Comparison

OFS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 25.60%, more than GLAD's 9.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GLAD
Gladstone Capital Corporation
9.72%9.85%8.37%9.16%8.42%6.73%8.97%8.46%11.51%9.12%8.95%11.49%
OFS
OFS Capital Corporation
25.60%25.00%16.85%11.45%11.43%8.35%12.03%12.18%12.83%11.43%9.88%11.85%

Financials

OFS vs. GLAD - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between OFS Capital Corporation and Gladstone Capital Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


-10.00M0.0010.00M20.00M30.00M40.00M20222023202420252026
-2.40M
21.49M
(OFS) Total Revenue
(GLAD) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


OFS and GLAD have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OFS has higher volatility (15.88%) compared to GLAD (6.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OFS dropped -69.09% vs GLAD's -74.87%.

GLAD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.94 vs -1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OFS and GLAD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer