PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OFS vs. ARLP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

OFS vs. ARLP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in OFS Capital Corporation (OFS) and Alliance Resource Partners, L.P. (ARLP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OFS achieves a -21.98% return, which is significantly lower than ARLP's 17.26% return. Over the past 10 years, OFS has underperformed ARLP with an annualized return of -1.47%, while ARLP has yielded a comparatively higher 13.40% annualized return.


OFS

1D
2.13%
1M
-6.93%
6M
-25.28%
YTD
-21.98%
1Y
-51.82%
3Y*
-19.90%
5Y*
-6.81%
10Y*
-1.47%
ALL TIME*
0.99%

ARLP

1D
-0.92%
1M
8.99%
6M
14.36%
YTD
17.26%
1Y
7.41%
3Y*
21.62%
5Y*
40.15%
10Y*
13.40%
ALL TIME*
15.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$6.60M$5.99M$7.50M
$162.18K$161.21K$216.81K

OFS vs. ARLP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
OFS
OFS Capital Corporation
-21.98%-31.59%-20.19%29.93%3.28%66.92%-25.16%17.95%-0.24%-4.40%
ARLP
Alliance Resource Partners, L.P.
17.26%-2.45%39.91%18.83%73.34%195.75%-56.80%-28.90%-1.90%-4.04%

Correlation

The correlation between OFS and ARLP is -0.03, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.13

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2012

0.13

The correlation between OFS and ARLP shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.14 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

OFS:

$45.02M

ARLP:

$3.34B

EPS

OFS:

-$2.07

ARLP:

$2.07

PB Ratio

OFS:

0.40

ARLP:

0.00

Total Revenue (TTM)

OFS:

-$919.00K

ARLP:

$2.17B

Gross Profit (TTM)

OFS:

-$17.89M

ARLP:

$613.22M

EBITDA (TTM)

OFS:

-$23.53M

ARLP:

$650.79M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OFS vs. ARLP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

OFS
OFS Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
OFS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OFS Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
OFS Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
OFS Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
OFS Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

ARLP
ARLP Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
ARLP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARLP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARLP Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
ARLP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARLP Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

OFS vs. ARLP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for OFS Capital Corporation (OFS) and Alliance Resource Partners, L.P. (ARLP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


OFSARLPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.80

1.08

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.83

0.47

-1.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.23

0.91

-2.15

OFS vs. ARLP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OFS Sharpe Ratio is -1.04, which is lower than the ARLP Sharpe Ratio of 0.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OFS and ARLP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

OFS vs. ARLP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OFS drawdown since its inception was -69.09%, smaller than the maximum ARLP drawdown of -90.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OFS and ARLP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OFSARLPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.09%

-90.52%

+21.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-64.17%

-16.92%

-47.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-66.97%

-20.83%

-46.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-66.97%

-29.13%

-37.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-69.09%

-85.26%

+16.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-58.57%

-8.33%

-50.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.82%

-24.27%

+9.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

42.83%

8.61%

+34.22%

Volatility

OFS vs. ARLP - Volatility Comparison

OFS Capital Corporation (OFS) has a higher volatility of 13.48% compared to Alliance Resource Partners, L.P. (ARLP) at 5.29%. This indicates that OFS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ARLP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OFSARLPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.48%

5.29%

+8.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

40.92%

16.91%

+24.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

50.85%

22.98%

+27.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.57%

32.69%

+1.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.53%

49.67%

-9.14%

Dividends

OFS vs. ARLP - Dividend Comparison

OFS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 25.30%, more than ARLP's 9.25% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ARLP
Alliance Resource Partners, L.P.
9.25%11.19%10.65%13.22%7.38%3.16%8.93%19.82%11.94%9.54%8.85%19.74%
OFS
OFS Capital Corporation
25.30%25.00%16.85%11.45%11.43%8.35%12.03%12.18%12.83%11.43%9.88%11.85%

Financials

OFS vs. ARLP - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between OFS Capital Corporation and Alliance Resource Partners, L.P.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

OFS vs. ARLP - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between OFS Capital Corporation and Alliance Resource Partners, L.P. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

OFS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, OFS Capital Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 6.21M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

ARLP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Alliance Resource Partners, L.P. reported a gross profit of 202.70M and revenue of 551.56M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.8%.

OFS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, OFS Capital Corporation reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 6.21M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

ARLP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Alliance Resource Partners, L.P. reported an operating income of 95.59M and revenue of 551.56M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.3%.

OFS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, OFS Capital Corporation reported a net income of 0.00 and revenue of 6.21M, resulting in a net margin of 0.0%.

ARLP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Alliance Resource Partners, L.P. reported a net income of 79.56M and revenue of 551.56M, resulting in a net margin of 14.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


OFS and ARLP have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OFS has higher volatility (13.48%) compared to ARLP (5.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OFS dropped -69.09% vs ARLP's -90.52%.

ARLP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.34 vs -1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OFS and ARLP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer