PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OFALX vs. NQCRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OFALX vs. NQCRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Olstein All Cap Value Fund (OFALX) and Nuveen Large Cap Value Fund (NQCRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OFALX achieves a 4.48% return, which is significantly lower than NQCRX's 16.10% return. Over the past 10 years, OFALX has underperformed NQCRX with an annualized return of 8.18%, while NQCRX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.09% annualized return.


OFALX

1D
0.05%
1M
3.21%
YTD
4.48%
6M
6.68%
1Y
15.17%
3Y*
9.33%
5Y*
2.37%
10Y*
8.18%

NQCRX

1D
0.62%
1M
2.04%
YTD
16.10%
6M
17.86%
1Y
36.85%
3Y*
22.52%
5Y*
13.93%
10Y*
14.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OFALX vs. NQCRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
OFALX
Olstein All Cap Value Fund
4.48%7.07%8.94%11.39%-19.24%25.52%10.01%31.54%-11.04%14.30%
NQCRX
Nuveen Large Cap Value Fund
16.10%22.44%17.74%13.76%-1.07%25.38%-0.27%47.63%-15.47%15.46%

Correlation

The correlation between OFALX and NQCRX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2006

0.91

The correlation between OFALX and NQCRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OFALX vs. NQCRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OFALX
OFALX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
OFALX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OFALX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
OFALX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
OFALX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
OFALX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

NQCRX
NQCRX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
NQCRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NQCRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
NQCRX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
NQCRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
NQCRX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OFALX vs. NQCRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Olstein All Cap Value Fund (OFALX) and Nuveen Large Cap Value Fund (NQCRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


OFALXNQCRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.54

-0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.64

6.31

-4.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.13

23.54

-18.41

OFALX vs. NQCRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OFALX Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is lower than the NQCRX Sharpe Ratio of 3.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OFALX and NQCRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


OFALXNQCRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.20

3.10

-1.89

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

0.90

-0.76

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

0.75

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.39

+0.06

Drawdowns

OFALX vs. NQCRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OFALX drawdown since its inception was -63.49%, which is greater than NQCRX's maximum drawdown of -57.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OFALX and NQCRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OFALXNQCRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.49%

-57.85%

-5.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.08%

-6.07%

-4.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.22%

-17.21%

-3.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.27%

-17.61%

-10.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.26%

-41.84%

+0.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.10%

-0.76%

-1.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.45%

-10.01%

-0.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.21%

1.62%

+1.59%

Volatility

OFALX vs. NQCRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Olstein All Cap Value Fund (OFALX) is 3.34%, while Nuveen Large Cap Value Fund (NQCRX) has a volatility of 3.84%. This indicates that OFALX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NQCRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OFALXNQCRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.34%

3.84%

-0.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.62%

9.51%

+0.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.75%

12.37%

+1.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.39%

15.60%

+1.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.26%

18.93%

+2.33%

OFALX vs. NQCRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

OFALX has a 2.15% expense ratio, which is higher than NQCRX's 0.74% expense ratio.


Dividends

OFALX vs. NQCRX - Dividend Comparison

OFALX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.19%, more than NQCRX's 6.29% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NQCRX
Nuveen Large Cap Value Fund
6.29%7.30%6.82%2.22%4.63%20.85%17.95%26.88%34.12%27.42%10.74%61.01%
OFALX
Olstein All Cap Value Fund
8.19%8.56%11.24%0.13%10.61%19.70%0.18%6.55%11.05%6.08%0.22%17.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


OFALX and NQCRX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NQCRX has higher volatility (3.84%) compared to OFALX (3.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OFALX dropped -63.49% vs NQCRX's -57.85%.

NQCRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.10 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OFALX and NQCRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer