PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OFALX vs. FALGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OFALX vs. FALGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Olstein All Cap Value Fund (OFALX) and Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class M (FALGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

Over the past 10 years, OFALX has underperformed FALGX with an annualized return of 8.18%, while FALGX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.97% annualized return.


OFALX

1D
0.05%
1M
3.21%
YTD
4.48%
6M
6.68%
1Y
15.17%
3Y*
9.33%
5Y*
2.37%
10Y*
8.18%

FALGX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
0.00%
6M
0.00%
1Y
11.81%
3Y*
16.34%
5Y*
10.59%
10Y*
12.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OFALX vs. FALGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
OFALX
Olstein All Cap Value Fund
4.48%7.07%8.94%11.39%-19.24%25.52%10.01%31.54%-11.04%14.30%
FALGX
Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class M
0.00%19.09%18.68%22.88%-8.40%25.20%8.27%31.01%-8.88%16.83%

Correlation

The correlation between OFALX and FALGX is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 1996

0.87

Over the past year, the correlation between OFALX and FALGX has dropped to 0.36 - well below their long-term average of 0.87, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OFALX vs. FALGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OFALX
OFALX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
OFALX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OFALX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
OFALX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
OFALX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
OFALX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

FALGX
FALGX Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
FALGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FALGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
FALGX Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
FALGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
FALGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OFALX vs. FALGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Olstein All Cap Value Fund (OFALX) and Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class M (FALGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


OFALXFALGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.47

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.64

2.81

-1.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.13

4.79

+0.34

OFALX vs. FALGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OFALX Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is lower than the FALGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OFALX and FALGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


OFALXFALGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.20

1.77

-0.57

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

0.66

-0.52

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

0.71

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.44

+0.02

Drawdowns

OFALX vs. FALGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OFALX drawdown since its inception was -63.49%, roughly equal to the maximum FALGX drawdown of -64.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OFALX and FALGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OFALXFALGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.49%

-64.07%

+0.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.08%

-5.06%

-5.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.22%

-21.78%

+1.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.27%

-21.78%

-6.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.26%

-37.58%

-3.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.10%

-4.20%

+2.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.45%

-14.43%

+3.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.21%

2.80%

+0.41%

Volatility

OFALX vs. FALGX - Volatility Comparison

Olstein All Cap Value Fund (OFALX) has a higher volatility of 3.34% compared to Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class M (FALGX) at 0.00%. This indicates that OFALX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FALGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OFALXFALGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.34%

0.00%

+3.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.62%

4.21%

+5.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.75%

8.06%

+5.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.39%

16.65%

+0.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.26%

18.67%

+2.59%

OFALX vs. FALGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

OFALX has a 2.15% expense ratio, which is higher than FALGX's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

OFALX vs. FALGX - Dividend Comparison

OFALX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.19%, more than FALGX's 5.76% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FALGX
Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class M
5.76%5.76%0.00%3.20%1.91%6.44%5.25%8.39%16.99%6.42%1.85%2.74%
OFALX
Olstein All Cap Value Fund
8.19%8.56%11.24%0.13%10.61%19.70%0.18%6.55%11.05%6.08%0.22%17.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


OFALX and FALGX have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OFALX has higher volatility (3.34%) compared to FALGX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OFALX dropped -63.49% vs FALGX's -64.07%.

FALGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OFALX and FALGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer