OEPIX vs. PGNAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Oil Equipment & Services UltraSector ProFund (OEPIX) and PGIM Jennison Natural Resources Fund (PGNAX).
OEPIX is managed by ProFunds. It was launched on Jun 4, 2006. PGNAX is managed by PGIM. It was launched on Jan 21, 1990.
Performance
OEPIX vs. PGNAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
OEPIX vs. PGNAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OEPIX Oil Equipment & Services UltraSector ProFund | 67.38% | -1.85% | -15.41% | -3.76% | 88.50% | 14.90% | -91.88% | -4.45% | -58.58% | -22.70% |
PGNAX PGIM Jennison Natural Resources Fund | 18.84% | 38.58% | 0.80% | -2.22% | 24.40% | 27.22% | 11.22% | 16.50% | -27.87% | 4.99% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OEPIX achieves a 67.38% return, which is significantly higher than PGNAX's 18.84% return. Over the past 10 years, OEPIX has underperformed PGNAX with an annualized return of -20.13%, while PGNAX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.39% annualized return.
OEPIX
- 1D
- 1.29%
- 1M
- 4.15%
- YTD
- 67.38%
- 6M
- 92.98%
- 1Y
- 88.79%
- 3Y*
- 16.24%
- 5Y*
- 16.69%
- 10Y*
- -20.13%
PGNAX
- 1D
- 2.81%
- 1M
- -5.30%
- YTD
- 18.84%
- 6M
- 29.40%
- 1Y
- 61.24%
- 3Y*
- 19.40%
- 5Y*
- 17.34%
- 10Y*
- 12.39%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
OEPIX vs. PGNAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
OEPIX has a 1.65% expense ratio, which is higher than PGNAX's 1.27% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
OEPIX vs. PGNAX — Risk / Return Rank
OEPIX
PGNAX
OEPIX vs. PGNAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Oil Equipment & Services UltraSector ProFund (OEPIX) and PGIM Jennison Natural Resources Fund (PGNAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| OEPIX | PGNAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.56 | 2.53 | -0.98 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.00 | 2.96 | -0.96 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.47 | -0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.36 | 3.99 | -1.62 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.09 | 17.74 | -11.65 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OEPIX | PGNAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.56 | 2.53 | -0.98 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 | 0.68 | -0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.30 | 0.47 | -0.77 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.25 | 0.35 | -0.60 |
Correlation
The correlation between OEPIX and PGNAX is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
OEPIX vs. PGNAX - Dividend Comparison
OEPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, less than PGNAX's 0.81% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OEPIX Oil Equipment & Services UltraSector ProFund | 0.52% | 0.87% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 2.56% | 2.36% | 0.05% |
PGNAX PGIM Jennison Natural Resources Fund | 0.81% | 0.96% | 0.98% | 1.93% | 2.75% | 0.84% | 1.32% | 1.78% | 1.59% | 0.00% | 1.15% |
Drawdowns
OEPIX vs. PGNAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OEPIX drawdown since its inception was -99.30%, which is greater than PGNAX's maximum drawdown of -76.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OEPIX and PGNAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| OEPIX | PGNAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.30% | -76.46% | -22.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -39.36% | -15.76% | -23.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -65.50% | -29.24% | -36.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -97.79% | -63.86% | -33.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -97.83% | -5.30% | -92.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -71.84% | -20.31% | -51.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.28% | 3.54% | +11.74% |
Volatility
OEPIX vs. PGNAX - Volatility Comparison
Oil Equipment & Services UltraSector ProFund (OEPIX) has a higher volatility of 11.62% compared to PGIM Jennison Natural Resources Fund (PGNAX) at 8.49%. This indicates that OEPIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PGNAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| OEPIX | PGNAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.62% | 8.49% | +3.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.02% | 18.50% | +14.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 60.04% | 24.97% | +35.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 57.70% | 25.49% | +32.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 66.60% | 26.55% | +40.05% |