PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OEMYX vs. IVNQX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OEMYX vs. IVNQX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Emerging Markets Local Debt Fund (OEMYX) and Invesco Nasdaq 100 Index Fund (IVNQX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OEMYX achieves a -0.93% return, which is significantly lower than IVNQX's 14.15% return.


OEMYX

1D
-0.19%
1M
-0.74%
6M
-3.36%
YTD
-0.93%
1Y
4.26%
3Y*
4.77%
5Y*
1.74%
10Y*
2.32%
ALL TIME*
2.20%

IVNQX

1D
1.77%
1M
-1.89%
6M
13.75%
YTD
14.15%
1Y
24.49%
3Y*
24.06%
5Y*
14.49%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
17.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

OEMYX vs. IVNQX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
OEMYX
Invesco Emerging Markets Local Debt Fund
-0.93%18.09%-4.60%12.85%-9.39%-10.13%8.25%
IVNQX
Invesco Nasdaq 100 Index Fund
14.15%20.77%25.43%54.62%-32.05%26.75%8.46%

Correlation

The correlation between OEMYX and IVNQX is 0.47, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2020

0.34

The correlation between OEMYX and IVNQX shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (3 years) to 0.47 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OEMYX vs. IVNQX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

OEMYX
OEMYX Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
OEMYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OEMYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
OEMYX Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
OEMYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
OEMYX Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

IVNQX
IVNQX Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
IVNQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVNQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVNQX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
IVNQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVNQX Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

OEMYX vs. IVNQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Emerging Markets Local Debt Fund (OEMYX) and Invesco Nasdaq 100 Index Fund (IVNQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


OEMYXIVNQXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.24

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.59

2.27

-1.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.60

7.19

-5.59

OEMYX vs. IVNQX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OEMYX Sharpe Ratio is 0.62, which is lower than the IVNQX Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OEMYX and IVNQX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

OEMYX vs. IVNQX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OEMYX drawdown since its inception was -27.97%, smaller than the maximum IVNQX drawdown of -34.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OEMYX and IVNQX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OEMYXIVNQXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.97%

-34.83%

+6.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.22%

-11.95%

+2.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.22%

-22.70%

+13.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.72%

-34.83%

+12.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.03%

-6.11%

+2.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.80%

-8.12%

-0.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.23%

3.75%

-0.52%

Volatility

OEMYX vs. IVNQX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Emerging Markets Local Debt Fund (OEMYX) is 1.86%, while Invesco Nasdaq 100 Index Fund (IVNQX) has a volatility of 6.93%. This indicates that OEMYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IVNQX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OEMYXIVNQXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.86%

6.93%

-5.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.55%

15.98%

-8.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.75%

19.38%

-10.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.32%

23.00%

-14.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.68%

22.60%

-13.92%

OEMYX vs. IVNQX - Expense Ratio Comparison

OEMYX has a 1.12% expense ratio, which is higher than IVNQX's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

OEMYX vs. IVNQX - Dividend Comparison

OEMYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.75%, more than IVNQX's 1.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IVNQX
Invesco Nasdaq 100 Index Fund
1.15%1.31%0.72%0.54%0.73%0.84%0.19%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
OEMYX
Invesco Emerging Markets Local Debt Fund
4.75%6.33%7.09%4.98%4.71%4.64%3.35%5.49%6.24%6.14%10.70%6.59%

Frequently Asked Questions


OEMYX and IVNQX have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IVNQX has higher volatility (6.93%) compared to OEMYX (1.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OEMYX dropped -27.97% vs IVNQX's -34.83%.

IVNQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.40 vs 0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OEMYX and IVNQX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer