OEF vs. NRSH
OEF (iShares S&P 100 ETF) and NRSH (Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - OEF tracks the S&P 100 Index while NRSH tracks the Aztlan North America Nearshoring Price Return Index - Benchmark Price Return. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, OEF returned 29.74% vs 58.28% for NRSH. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. OEF charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for NRSH.
Performance
OEF vs. NRSH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OEF achieves a 9.86% return, which is significantly lower than NRSH's 46.91% return.
OEF
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- 4.92%
- YTD
- 9.86%
- 6M
- 9.63%
- 1Y
- 29.74%
- 3Y*
- 24.73%
- 5Y*
- 15.77%
- 10Y*
- 16.70%
NRSH
- 1D
- -0.68%
- 1M
- 8.69%
- YTD
- 46.91%
- 6M
- 44.09%
- 1Y
- 58.28%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OEF vs. NRSH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
OEF iShares S&P 100 ETF | 9.86% | 19.80% | 30.74% | 3.91% |
NRSH Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF | 46.91% | 12.95% | -6.17% | 8.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between OEF and NRSH is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2023 | 0.55 |
The correlation between OEF and NRSH shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (all time) to 0.66 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
OEF vs. NRSH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
OEF
NRSH
Technology
Communication Services
-
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Industrials
Energy
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
Technology
OEF
NRSH
Communication Services
OEF
NRSH
-
Financial Services
OEF
NRSH
-
Consumer Cyclical
OEF
NRSH
-
Healthcare
OEF
NRSH
-
Consumer Defensive
OEF
NRSH
-
Industrials
OEF
NRSH
Energy
OEF
NRSH
Utilities
OEF
NRSH
-
Basic Materials
OEF
NRSH
-
Real Estate
OEF
NRSH
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OEF vs. NRSH — Risk / Return Rank
OEF
NRSH
OEF vs. NRSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 100 ETF (OEF) and Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF (NRSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| OEF | NRSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.39 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.70 | 5.35 | -2.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.37 | 16.71 | -5.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OEF | NRSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.35 | 2.40 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.91 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 1.09 | -0.64 |
Drawdowns
OEF vs. NRSH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OEF drawdown since its inception was -54.11%, which is greater than NRSH's maximum drawdown of -24.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OEF and NRSH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OEF | NRSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.11% | -24.01% | -30.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.06% | -10.94% | -0.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.80% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.47% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.44% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.63% | -0.68% | +0.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.76% | -5.61% | -6.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.62% | 3.50% | -0.88% |
Volatility
OEF vs. NRSH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares S&P 100 ETF (OEF) is 3.09%, while Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF (NRSH) has a volatility of 8.57%. This indicates that OEF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NRSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OEF | NRSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.09% | 8.57% | -5.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.48% | 20.30% | -10.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.72% | 24.44% | -11.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.69% | 21.53% | -3.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.44% | 21.53% | -3.09% |
OEF vs. NRSH - Expense Ratio Comparison
OEF has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than NRSH's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
OEF vs. NRSH - Dividend Comparison
OEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%, more than NRSH's 0.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NRSH Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF | 0.28% | 0.42% | 0.90% | 0.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
OEF iShares S&P 100 ETF | 0.83% | 0.81% | 1.03% | 1.19% | 1.55% | 1.06% | 1.43% | 1.87% | 2.09% | 1.81% | 2.07% | 2.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OEF and NRSH have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NRSH has higher volatility (8.57%) compared to OEF (3.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OEF dropped -54.11% vs NRSH's -24.01%.
On 1-year performance, NRSH leads with 58.28% vs 29.74% for OEF. On fees, OEF is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, OEF has been the lower-risk option at 3.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, NRSH has performed better with a 58.28% return vs 29.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
OEF is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for NRSH.
OEF has the higher dividend yield at 0.83%, compared with 0.28% for NRSH.
OEF tracks S&P 100 Index, while NRSH tracks Aztlan North America Nearshoring Price Return Index - Benchmark Price Return. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Aztlan. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for OEF and 0.75% for NRSH.
NRSH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 2.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OEF and NRSH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer