OEF vs. DMAY
OEF (iShares S&P 100 ETF) and DMAY (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - OEF tracks the S&P 100 Index while DMAY tracks the Cboe S&P 500 30% (-5% to -35%) Buffer Protect May Series Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, OEF returned 15.77%/yr vs 7.21%/yr for DMAY. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. OEF charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for DMAY.
Performance
OEF vs. DMAY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OEF achieves a 9.86% return, which is significantly higher than DMAY's 4.64% return.
OEF
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- 4.92%
- YTD
- 9.86%
- 6M
- 9.63%
- 1Y
- 29.74%
- 3Y*
- 24.73%
- 5Y*
- 15.77%
- 10Y*
- 16.70%
DMAY
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 1.46%
- YTD
- 4.64%
- 6M
- 5.44%
- 1Y
- 12.58%
- 3Y*
- 12.08%
- 5Y*
- 7.21%
- 10Y*
- —
OEF vs. DMAY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OEF iShares S&P 100 ETF | 9.86% | 19.80% | 30.74% | 32.71% | -21.03% | 29.18% | 27.92% |
DMAY FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May | 4.64% | 11.05% | 12.82% | 15.40% | -9.98% | 6.14% | 6.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between OEF and DMAY is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2020 | 0.88 |
The correlation between OEF and DMAY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
OEF vs. DMAY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
OEF
DMAY
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Technology
OEF
DMAY
Communication Services
OEF
DMAY
Financial Services
OEF
DMAY
Consumer Cyclical
OEF
DMAY
Healthcare
OEF
DMAY
Consumer Defensive
OEF
DMAY
Industrials
OEF
DMAY
Energy
OEF
DMAY
Utilities
OEF
DMAY
Basic Materials
OEF
DMAY
Real Estate
OEF
DMAY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OEF vs. DMAY — Risk / Return Rank
OEF
DMAY
OEF vs. DMAY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 100 ETF (OEF) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May (DMAY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| OEF | DMAY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.89 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.61 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.70 | 3.79 | -1.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.37 | 23.15 | -11.78 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OEF | DMAY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.35 | 2.70 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 | 0.80 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.91 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.88 | -0.43 |
Drawdowns
OEF vs. DMAY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OEF drawdown since its inception was -54.11%, which is greater than DMAY's maximum drawdown of -13.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OEF and DMAY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OEF | DMAY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.11% | -13.90% | -40.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.06% | -3.36% | -7.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.80% | -12.38% | -7.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.47% | -13.90% | -12.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.44% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.63% | -0.08% | -0.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.76% | -2.24% | -9.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.62% | 0.55% | +2.07% |
Volatility
OEF vs. DMAY - Volatility Comparison
iShares S&P 100 ETF (OEF) has a higher volatility of 3.09% compared to FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May (DMAY) at 0.85%. This indicates that OEF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DMAY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OEF | DMAY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.09% | 0.85% | +2.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.48% | 3.74% | +5.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.72% | 4.73% | +7.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.69% | 9.02% | +8.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.44% | 8.42% | +10.02% |
OEF vs. DMAY - Expense Ratio Comparison
OEF has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than DMAY's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
OEF vs. DMAY - Dividend Comparison
OEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%, while DMAY has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DMAY FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
OEF iShares S&P 100 ETF | 0.83% | 0.81% | 1.03% | 1.19% | 1.55% | 1.06% | 1.43% | 1.87% | 2.09% | 1.81% | 2.07% | 2.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OEF and DMAY have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OEF has higher volatility (3.09%) compared to DMAY (0.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OEF dropped -54.11% vs DMAY's -13.90%.
On 5-year performance, OEF leads with 15.77% vs 7.21% for DMAY. On fees, OEF is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, DMAY has been the lower-risk option at 0.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, OEF has performed better with a 15.77% return vs 7.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
OEF is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DMAY.
OEF has the higher dividend yield at 0.83%, compared with 0.00% for DMAY.
OEF tracks S&P 100 Index, while DMAY tracks Cboe S&P 500 30% (-5% to -35%) Buffer Protect May Series Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for OEF and 0.85% for DMAY.
DMAY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 2.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OEF and DMAY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer