OCTW vs. EAPR

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

OCTW (AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Oct ETF) and EAPR (Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - April) are both Defined Outcome funds - OCTW tracks the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust while EAPR tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, OCTW returned 8.90%/yr vs 5.35%/yr for EAPR. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. OCTW charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for EAPR.

Performance

OCTW vs. EAPR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Oct ETF (OCTW) and Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - April (EAPR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OCTW achieves a 4.77% return, which is significantly lower than EAPR's 11.89% return.

OCTW

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: 1.63%
• YTD: 4.77%
• 6M: 5.36%
• 1Y: 12.92%
• 3Y*: 10.92%
• 5Y*: 8.90%
• 10Y*: —

EAPR

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: 2.45%
• YTD: 11.89%
• 6M: 12.71%
• 1Y: 22.51%
• 3Y*: 10.78%
• 5Y*: 5.35%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OCTW vs. EAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
OCTW AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Oct ETF	4.77%	9.68%	8.67%	17.57%	0.54%	4.61%
EAPR Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - April	11.89%	14.80%	2.86%	8.19%	-5.01%	-2.80%

Correlation

The correlation between OCTW and EAPR is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.56
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.49
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.51
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2021	0.51

The correlation between OCTW and EAPR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

OCTW vs. EAPR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	OCTW	EAPR
Technology	36.2%	36.9%
Financial Services	11.9%	19.5%
Communication Services	10.9%	6.9%
Consumer Cyclical	10.1%	9.5%
Healthcare	8.4%	2.9%
Industrials	8.1%	7.5%
Consumer Defensive	4.9%	3.0%
Energy	3.5%	4.1%
Utilities	2.3%	2.1%
Real Estate	1.9%	1.1%
Basic Materials	1.8%	6.5%

Return for Risk

OCTW vs. EAPR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OCTW

OCTW Risk / Return Rank: 82
OCTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
OCTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
OCTW Omega Ratio Rank: 87
OCTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
OCTW Martin Ratio Rank: 86

EAPR

EAPR Risk / Return Rank: 95
EAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
EAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
EAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 97
EAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
EAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OCTW vs. EAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Oct ETF (OCTW) and Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - April (EAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	OCTW	EAPR	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.64	3.13	-0.49
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.92	5.38	-1.46
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.55	1.87	-0.32
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.62	7.54	-3.92
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	18.66	43.49	-24.83
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

OCTW vs. EAPR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OCTW Sharpe Ratio is 2.64, which is comparable to the EAPR Sharpe Ratio of 3.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OCTW and EAPR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	OCTW	EAPR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.64	3.13	-0.49
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.42	0.53	+0.89
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.48	0.55	+0.93

Drawdowns

OCTW vs. EAPR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OCTW drawdown since its inception was -8.38%, smaller than the maximum EAPR drawdown of -17.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OCTW and EAPR.

Drawdown Indicators

	OCTW	EAPR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.38%	-17.65%	+9.27%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.65%	-3.02%	-0.63%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-8.38%	-10.24%	+1.86%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-8.38%	-17.65%	+9.27%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.82%	-4.07%	+3.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.71%	0.52%	+0.19%

Volatility

OCTW vs. EAPR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Oct ETF (OCTW) is 0.74%, while Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - April (EAPR) has a volatility of 3.75%. This indicates that OCTW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EAPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	OCTW	EAPR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.74%	3.75%	-3.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.81%	6.25%	-2.44%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.92%	7.22%	-2.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.29%	10.09%	-3.80%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.14%	10.02%	-3.88%

OCTW vs. EAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison

OCTW has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than EAPR's 0.89% expense ratio.

Dividends

OCTW vs. EAPR - Dividend Comparison

Neither OCTW nor EAPR has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both OCTW and EAPR in my portfolio?

OCTW and EAPR have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, OCTW or EAPR?

EAPR has higher volatility (3.75%) compared to OCTW (0.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OCTW dropped -8.38% vs EAPR's -17.65%.

Which ETF is better, OCTW or EAPR?

On 5-year performance, OCTW leads with 8.90% vs 5.35% for EAPR. On fees, OCTW is cheaper at 0.74% per year. On volatility, OCTW has been the lower-risk option at 0.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, OCTW or EAPR?

Over the 5-year period, OCTW has performed better with a 8.90% return vs 5.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, OCTW or EAPR?

OCTW is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for EAPR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, OCTW or EAPR?

OCTW and EAPR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between OCTW and EAPR?

OCTW tracks SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust, while EAPR tracks MSCI Emerging Markets. They also come from different issuers: Allianz and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for OCTW and 0.89% for EAPR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EAPR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.13 vs 2.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.