OCTW vs. DBO
OCTW (AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Oct ETF) and DBO (Invesco DB Oil Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - OCTW is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust, while DBO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil Index Excess Return. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, OCTW returned 8.90%/yr vs 15.57%/yr for DBO. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. OCTW charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for DBO.
Performance
OCTW vs. DBO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OCTW achieves a 4.77% return, which is significantly lower than DBO's 80.66% return.
OCTW
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 1.63%
- YTD
- 4.77%
- 6M
- 5.36%
- 1Y
- 12.92%
- 3Y*
- 10.92%
- 5Y*
- 8.90%
- 10Y*
- —
DBO
- 1D
- 1.05%
- 1M
- -0.09%
- YTD
- 80.66%
- 6M
- 78.46%
- 1Y
- 78.18%
- 3Y*
- 20.95%
- 5Y*
- 15.57%
- 10Y*
- 11.12%
OCTW vs. DBO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OCTW AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Oct ETF | 4.77% | 9.68% | 8.67% | 17.57% | 0.54% | 6.48% | 4.11% |
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund | 80.66% | -11.71% | 7.85% | -4.44% | 13.04% | 60.74% | 20.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between OCTW and DBO is -0.25, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2020 | 0.05 |
The correlation between OCTW and DBO shifts across timeframes, from -0.25 (1 year) to 0.05 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
OCTW vs. DBO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
OCTW
DBO
Technology
-
Financial Services
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
OCTW
DBO
-
Financial Services
OCTW
DBO
Communication Services
OCTW
DBO
-
Consumer Cyclical
OCTW
DBO
-
Healthcare
OCTW
DBO
-
Industrials
OCTW
DBO
-
Consumer Defensive
OCTW
DBO
-
Energy
OCTW
DBO
-
Utilities
OCTW
DBO
-
Real Estate
OCTW
DBO
-
Basic Materials
OCTW
DBO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OCTW vs. DBO — Risk / Return Rank
OCTW
DBO
OCTW vs. DBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Oct ETF (OCTW) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| OCTW | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.64 | 2.28 | +0.36 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.92 | 2.88 | +1.03 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.55 | 1.37 | +0.18 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.62 | 4.62 | -1.01 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.66 | 9.43 | +9.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OCTW | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.64 | 2.28 | +0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.42 | 0.49 | +0.94 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.35 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.48 | 0.02 | +1.47 |
Drawdowns
OCTW vs. DBO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OCTW drawdown since its inception was -8.38%, smaller than the maximum DBO drawdown of -90.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OCTW and DBO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OCTW | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.38% | -90.18% | +81.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.65% | -18.19% | +14.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.38% | -28.20% | +19.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -8.38% | -37.68% | +29.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -61.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -52.46% | +52.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.82% | -62.25% | +61.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.71% | 8.92% | -8.21% |
Volatility
OCTW vs. DBO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Oct ETF (OCTW) is 0.74%, while Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO) has a volatility of 13.25%. This indicates that OCTW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OCTW | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.74% | 13.25% | -12.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.81% | 28.15% | -24.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.92% | 34.54% | -29.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.29% | 32.28% | -25.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.14% | 31.78% | -25.64% |
OCTW vs. DBO - Expense Ratio Comparison
OCTW has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than DBO's 0.78% expense ratio.
Dividends
OCTW vs. DBO - Dividend Comparison
OCTW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DBO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.94%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund | 1.94% | 3.51% | 4.68% | 4.59% | 0.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.63% | 1.58% |
OCTW AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Oct ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OCTW and DBO have a correlation of -0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DBO has higher volatility (13.25%) compared to OCTW (0.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OCTW dropped -8.38% vs DBO's -90.18%.
On 5-year performance, DBO leads with 15.57% vs 8.90% for OCTW. On fees, OCTW is cheaper at 0.74% per year. On volatility, OCTW has been the lower-risk option at 0.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DBO has performed better with a 15.57% return vs 8.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
OCTW is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBO.
DBO has the higher dividend yield at 1.94%, compared with 0.00% for OCTW.
OCTW is categorized as Defined Outcome, while DBO is Oil & Gas. OCTW tracks SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust, while DBO tracks DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil Index Excess Return. They also come from different issuers: Allianz and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for OCTW and 0.78% for DBO.
OCTW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OCTW and DBO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer