PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OCTW vs. APRW
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

OCTW vs. APRW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Oct ETF (OCTW) and AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Apr ETF (APRW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

OCTW vs. APRW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
OCTW
AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Oct ETF
-0.95%9.68%8.67%17.57%0.54%6.48%4.11%
APRW
AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Apr ETF
1.84%6.18%11.25%12.38%-2.90%5.58%3.20%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OCTW achieves a -0.95% return, which is significantly lower than APRW's 1.84% return.


OCTW

1D
0.42%
1M
-1.55%
YTD
-0.95%
6M
0.51%
1Y
9.74%
3Y*
9.86%
5Y*
7.86%
10Y*

APRW

1D
0.35%
1M
1.02%
YTD
1.84%
6M
3.66%
1Y
10.51%
3Y*
9.52%
5Y*
6.61%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


OCTW vs. APRW - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both OCTW and APRW have an expense ratio of 0.74%.


Return for Risk

OCTW vs. APRW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OCTW
OCTW Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
OCTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OCTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
OCTW Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
OCTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
OCTW Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

APRW
APRW Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
APRW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APRW Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
APRW Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
APRW Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
APRW Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OCTW vs. APRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Oct ETF (OCTW) and AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Apr ETF (APRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


OCTWAPRWDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.22

1.52

-0.31

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.80

2.26

-0.46

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.53

-0.23

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.70

1.89

-0.19

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.08

13.00

-3.92

OCTW vs. APRW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OCTW Sharpe Ratio is 1.22, which is comparable to the APRW Sharpe Ratio of 1.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OCTW and APRW, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


OCTWAPRWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.22

1.52

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.26

0.99

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.34

1.05

+0.29

Correlation

The correlation between OCTW and APRW is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

OCTW vs. APRW - Dividend Comparison

Neither OCTW nor APRW has paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM202520242023202220212020
OCTW
AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Oct ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
APRW
AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Apr ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%3.67%

Drawdowns

OCTW vs. APRW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OCTW drawdown since its inception was -8.38%, smaller than the maximum APRW drawdown of -9.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OCTW and APRW.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


OCTWAPRWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.38%

-9.61%

+1.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.86%

-5.62%

-0.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-8.38%

-9.61%

+1.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.93%

0.00%

-1.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.84%

-1.15%

+0.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.10%

0.82%

+0.28%

Volatility

OCTW vs. APRW - Volatility Comparison

AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Oct ETF (OCTW) has a higher volatility of 2.45% compared to AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Apr ETF (APRW) at 0.77%. This indicates that OCTW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than APRW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


OCTWAPRWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.45%

0.77%

+1.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.09%

1.63%

+2.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.04%

6.92%

+1.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.25%

6.73%

-0.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.19%

6.47%

-0.28%