PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OCTW vs. APRT
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

OCTW vs. APRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Oct ETF (OCTW) and AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Apr ETF (APRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

OCTW vs. APRT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
OCTW
AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Oct ETF
-1.36%9.68%8.67%17.57%0.54%6.48%4.11%
APRT
AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Apr ETF
2.08%7.99%15.15%22.13%-6.41%11.89%4.40%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OCTW achieves a -1.36% return, which is significantly lower than APRT's 2.08% return.


OCTW

1D
1.37%
1M
-2.01%
YTD
-1.36%
6M
0.36%
1Y
9.54%
3Y*
9.71%
5Y*
7.77%
10Y*

APRT

1D
2.34%
1M
0.97%
YTD
2.08%
6M
4.40%
1Y
14.62%
3Y*
12.89%
5Y*
9.79%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


OCTW vs. APRT - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both OCTW and APRT have an expense ratio of 0.74%.


Return for Risk

OCTW vs. APRT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OCTW
OCTW Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
OCTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OCTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
OCTW Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
OCTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
OCTW Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

APRT
APRT Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
APRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
APRT Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
APRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
APRT Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OCTW vs. APRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Oct ETF (OCTW) and AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Apr ETF (APRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


OCTWAPRTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.19

1.34

-0.15

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.76

2.04

-0.27

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.43

-0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.68

1.77

-0.09

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.02

11.67

-2.66

OCTW vs. APRT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OCTW Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is comparable to the APRT Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OCTW and APRT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


OCTWAPRTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.19

1.34

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.25

0.91

+0.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.33

0.99

+0.33

Correlation

The correlation between OCTW and APRT is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

OCTW vs. APRT - Dividend Comparison

Neither OCTW nor APRT has paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM202520242023202220212020
OCTW
AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Oct ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
APRT
AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Apr ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%4.67%

Drawdowns

OCTW vs. APRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OCTW drawdown since its inception was -8.38%, smaller than the maximum APRT drawdown of -14.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OCTW and APRT.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


OCTWAPRTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.38%

-14.98%

+6.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.86%

-8.70%

+2.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-8.38%

-14.98%

+6.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.33%

0.00%

-2.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.84%

-2.11%

+1.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.09%

1.32%

-0.23%

Volatility

OCTW vs. APRT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Oct ETF (OCTW) is 2.42%, while AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Apr ETF (APRT) has a volatility of 3.02%. This indicates that OCTW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than APRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


OCTWAPRTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.42%

3.02%

-0.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.07%

3.81%

+0.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.03%

10.98%

-2.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.25%

10.82%

-4.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.19%

10.40%

-4.21%