OCTQ vs. SFLR
OCTQ (Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - October) and SFLR (Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF) are both Options Trading funds from Innovator. Both are actively managed. OCTQ charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for SFLR.
Performance
OCTQ vs. SFLR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
OCTQ
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SFLR
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- 5.11%
- YTD
- 5.55%
- 6M
- 5.78%
- 1Y
- 19.44%
- 3Y*
- 16.02%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OCTQ vs. SFLR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
OCTQ Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - October | 0.00% |
SFLR Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF | 5.01% |
OCTQ vs. SFLR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
OCTQ
SFLR
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
OCTQ
SFLR
Financial Services
OCTQ
SFLR
Consumer Cyclical
OCTQ
SFLR
Communication Services
OCTQ
SFLR
Healthcare
OCTQ
SFLR
Industrials
OCTQ
SFLR
Consumer Defensive
OCTQ
SFLR
Energy
OCTQ
SFLR
Utilities
OCTQ
SFLR
Real Estate
OCTQ
SFLR
Basic Materials
OCTQ
SFLR
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OCTQ vs. SFLR — Risk / Return Rank
OCTQ
SFLR
OCTQ vs. SFLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - October (OCTQ) and Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF (SFLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OCTQ | SFLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.20 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 1.71 | — |
Drawdowns
OCTQ vs. SFLR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OCTQ drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum SFLR drawdown of -12.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OCTQ and SFLR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OCTQ | SFLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -12.13% | +12.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.79% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -12.13% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.38% | +0.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -1.74% | +1.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.66% | — |
Volatility
OCTQ vs. SFLR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OCTQ | SFLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.87% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 6.46% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.00% | 8.89% | -8.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 10.15% | -10.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 10.15% | -10.15% |
OCTQ vs. SFLR - Expense Ratio Comparison
OCTQ has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than SFLR's 0.89% expense ratio.
Dividends
OCTQ vs. SFLR - Dividend Comparison
OCTQ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SFLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OCTQ Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - October | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SFLR Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF | 0.32% | 0.33% | 0.42% | 1.16% | 0.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, OCTQ is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
OCTQ is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for SFLR.
SFLR has the higher dividend yield at 0.32%, compared with 0.00% for OCTQ.
Their fees differ too: 0.79% for OCTQ and 0.89% for SFLR.
Find the right allocation for OCTQ and SFLR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer