PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OCTQ vs. HELO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OCTQ vs. HELO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - October (OCTQ) and JPMorgan Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HELO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


OCTQ

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HELO

1D
-0.21%
1M
0.59%
YTD
2.31%
6M
2.92%
1Y
11.08%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OCTQ vs. HELO - Yearly Performance Comparison


OCTQ vs. HELO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
OCTQ
HELO

Technology

35.3%
39.8%

Financial Services

13.4%
10.0%

Consumer Cyclical

10.6%
11.6%

Communication Services

9.9%
10.9%

Healthcare

8.8%
8.2%

Industrials

7.8%
6.0%

Consumer Defensive

5.2%
3.5%

Energy

3.0%
3.3%

Utilities

2.5%
2.5%

Real Estate

2.0%
1.8%

Basic Materials

1.6%
1.5%

Technology

OCTQ
35.3%
HELO
39.8%

Financial Services

OCTQ
13.4%
HELO
10.0%

Consumer Cyclical

OCTQ
10.6%
HELO
11.6%

Communication Services

OCTQ
9.9%
HELO
10.9%

Healthcare

OCTQ
8.8%
HELO
8.2%

Industrials

OCTQ
7.8%
HELO
6.0%

Consumer Defensive

OCTQ
5.2%
HELO
3.5%

Energy

OCTQ
3.0%
HELO
3.3%

Utilities

OCTQ
2.5%
HELO
2.5%

Real Estate

OCTQ
2.0%
HELO
1.8%

Basic Materials

OCTQ
1.6%
HELO
1.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OCTQ vs. HELO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OCTQ

HELO
HELO Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
HELO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HELO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
HELO Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
HELO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
HELO Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OCTQ vs. HELO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - October (OCTQ) and JPMorgan Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HELO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

OCTQ vs. HELO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


OCTQHELODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.79

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.64

Drawdowns

OCTQ vs. HELO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OCTQ drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum HELO drawdown of -10.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OCTQ and HELO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OCTQHELODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-10.89%

+10.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.28%

+0.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-1.18%

+1.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.30%

Volatility

OCTQ vs. HELO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OCTQHELODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.00%

6.21%

-6.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.00%

7.96%

-7.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.00%

7.96%

-7.96%

OCTQ vs. HELO - Expense Ratio Comparison

OCTQ has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than HELO's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

OCTQ vs. HELO - Dividend Comparison

OCTQ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HELO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%.


PositionTTM202520242023
HELO
JPMorgan Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF
0.62%0.67%0.60%0.19%
OCTQ
Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - October
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, HELO is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HELO is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for OCTQ.

HELO has the higher dividend yield at 0.62%, compared with 0.00% for OCTQ.

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for OCTQ and 0.50% for HELO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OCTQ and HELO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer