PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OCTQ vs. GMAY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OCTQ vs. GMAY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - October (OCTQ) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - May (GMAY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


OCTQ

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GMAY

1D
-0.35%
1M
1.29%
YTD
4.42%
6M
5.09%
1Y
12.38%
3Y*
12.18%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OCTQ vs. GMAY - Yearly Performance Comparison


OCTQ vs. GMAY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
OCTQ
GMAY

Technology

35.3%
36.2%

Financial Services

13.4%
11.9%

Consumer Cyclical

10.6%
10.1%

Communication Services

9.9%
10.9%

Healthcare

8.8%
8.4%

Industrials

7.8%
8.1%

Consumer Defensive

5.2%
4.9%

Energy

3.0%
3.5%

Utilities

2.5%
2.3%

Real Estate

2.0%
1.9%

Basic Materials

1.6%
1.8%

Technology

OCTQ
35.3%
GMAY
36.2%

Financial Services

OCTQ
13.4%
GMAY
11.9%

Consumer Cyclical

OCTQ
10.6%
GMAY
10.1%

Communication Services

OCTQ
9.9%
GMAY
10.9%

Healthcare

OCTQ
8.8%
GMAY
8.4%

Industrials

OCTQ
7.8%
GMAY
8.1%

Consumer Defensive

OCTQ
5.2%
GMAY
4.9%

Energy

OCTQ
3.0%
GMAY
3.5%

Utilities

OCTQ
2.5%
GMAY
2.3%

Real Estate

OCTQ
2.0%
GMAY
1.9%

Basic Materials

OCTQ
1.6%
GMAY
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OCTQ vs. GMAY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OCTQ

GMAY
GMAY Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
GMAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GMAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
GMAY Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
GMAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
GMAY Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OCTQ vs. GMAY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - October (OCTQ) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - May (GMAY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

OCTQ vs. GMAY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


OCTQGMAYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.61

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.60

Drawdowns

OCTQ vs. GMAY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OCTQ drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum GMAY drawdown of -11.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OCTQ and GMAY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OCTQGMAYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-11.75%

+11.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.35%

+0.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-0.72%

+0.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.53%

Volatility

OCTQ vs. GMAY - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OCTQGMAYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.00%

4.77%

-4.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.00%

7.85%

-7.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.00%

7.85%

-7.85%

OCTQ vs. GMAY - Expense Ratio Comparison

OCTQ has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than GMAY's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

OCTQ vs. GMAY - Dividend Comparison

Neither OCTQ nor GMAY has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, OCTQ is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

OCTQ is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for GMAY.

OCTQ and GMAY have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for OCTQ and 0.85% for GMAY.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OCTQ and GMAY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer