OCTP vs. BUFP
OCTP (PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - October) and BUFP (PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds from PGIM. OCTP is actively managed, while BUFP is passively managed. Over the past year, OCTP returned 17.74% vs 17.24% for BUFP. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.50% expense ratio.
Performance
OCTP vs. BUFP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with OCTP having a 6.17% return and BUFP slightly higher at 6.23%.
OCTP
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 2.44%
- YTD
- 6.17%
- 6M
- 6.81%
- 1Y
- 17.74%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BUFP
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 2.04%
- YTD
- 6.23%
- 6M
- 7.00%
- 1Y
- 17.24%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OCTP vs. BUFP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
OCTP PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - October | 6.17% | 13.14% | 5.84% |
BUFP PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF | 6.23% | 12.92% | 6.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between OCTP and BUFP is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2024 | 0.93 |
The correlation between OCTP and BUFP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OCTP vs. BUFP — Risk / Return Rank
OCTP
BUFP
OCTP vs. BUFP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - October (OCTP) and PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF (BUFP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| OCTP | BUFP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.58 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.41 | 3.93 | -0.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.93 | 21.96 | -5.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OCTP | BUFP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.48 | 2.77 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.38 | 1.40 | -0.02 |
Drawdowns
OCTP vs. BUFP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OCTP drawdown since its inception was -11.96%, roughly equal to the maximum BUFP drawdown of -11.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OCTP and BUFP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OCTP | BUFP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.96% | -11.98% | +0.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.22% | -4.41% | -0.81% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.19% | -0.22% | +0.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.05% | -1.00% | -0.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.05% | 0.79% | +0.26% |
Volatility
OCTP vs. BUFP - Volatility Comparison
PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - October (OCTP) has a higher volatility of 1.35% compared to PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF (BUFP) at 0.95%. This indicates that OCTP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BUFP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OCTP | BUFP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.35% | 0.95% | +0.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.53% | 4.82% | +0.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.21% | 6.27% | +0.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.61% | 9.49% | +0.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.61% | 9.49% | +0.12% |
OCTP vs. BUFP - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both OCTP and BUFP have an expense ratio of 0.50%.
Dividends
OCTP vs. BUFP - Dividend Comparison
OCTP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BUFP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BUFP PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.02% |
OCTP PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - October | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, OCTP and BUFP move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
OCTP has higher volatility (1.35%) compared to BUFP (0.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OCTP dropped -11.96% vs BUFP's -11.98%.
On 1-year performance, OCTP leads with 17.74% vs 17.24% for BUFP. Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. On volatility, BUFP has been the lower-risk option at 0.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, OCTP has performed better with a 17.74% return vs 17.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
OCTP and BUFP have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.
BUFP has the higher dividend yield at 0.01%, compared with 0.00% for OCTP.
BUFP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.77 vs 2.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OCTP and BUFP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer