PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OCTP vs. BUFP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OCTP vs. BUFP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - October (OCTP) and PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF (BUFP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with OCTP having a 6.17% return and BUFP slightly higher at 6.23%.


OCTP

1D
-0.19%
1M
2.44%
YTD
6.17%
6M
6.81%
1Y
17.74%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BUFP

1D
-0.22%
1M
2.04%
YTD
6.23%
6M
7.00%
1Y
17.24%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OCTP vs. BUFP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
OCTP
PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - October
6.17%13.14%5.84%
BUFP
PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF
6.23%12.92%6.36%

Correlation

The correlation between OCTP and BUFP is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2024

0.93

The correlation between OCTP and BUFP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OCTP vs. BUFP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OCTP
OCTP Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
OCTP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OCTP Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
OCTP Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
OCTP Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
OCTP Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

BUFP
BUFP Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
BUFP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUFP Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUFP Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
BUFP Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUFP Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OCTP vs. BUFP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - October (OCTP) and PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF (BUFP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


OCTPBUFPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.58

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.41

3.93

-0.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.93

21.96

-5.03

OCTP vs. BUFP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OCTP Sharpe Ratio is 2.48, which is comparable to the BUFP Sharpe Ratio of 2.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OCTP and BUFP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


OCTPBUFPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.48

2.77

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.38

1.40

-0.02

Drawdowns

OCTP vs. BUFP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OCTP drawdown since its inception was -11.96%, roughly equal to the maximum BUFP drawdown of -11.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OCTP and BUFP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OCTPBUFPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.96%

-11.98%

+0.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.22%

-4.41%

-0.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.19%

-0.22%

+0.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.05%

-1.00%

-0.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.05%

0.79%

+0.26%

Volatility

OCTP vs. BUFP - Volatility Comparison

PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - October (OCTP) has a higher volatility of 1.35% compared to PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF (BUFP) at 0.95%. This indicates that OCTP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BUFP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OCTPBUFPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.35%

0.95%

+0.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.53%

4.82%

+0.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.21%

6.27%

+0.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.61%

9.49%

+0.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.61%

9.49%

+0.12%

OCTP vs. BUFP - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both OCTP and BUFP have an expense ratio of 0.50%.


Dividends

OCTP vs. BUFP - Dividend Comparison

OCTP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BUFP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%.


PositionTTM20252024
BUFP
PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF
0.01%0.01%0.02%
OCTP
PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - October
0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, OCTP and BUFP move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

OCTP has higher volatility (1.35%) compared to BUFP (0.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OCTP dropped -11.96% vs BUFP's -11.98%.

On 1-year performance, OCTP leads with 17.74% vs 17.24% for BUFP. Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. On volatility, BUFP has been the lower-risk option at 0.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, OCTP has performed better with a 17.74% return vs 17.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

OCTP and BUFP have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.

BUFP has the higher dividend yield at 0.01%, compared with 0.00% for OCTP.

BUFP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.77 vs 2.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OCTP and BUFP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer