OCTM vs. FBUF

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

OCTM (FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - October) and FBUF (Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, OCTM returned 8.16% vs 19.61% for FBUF. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. OCTM charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for FBUF.

Performance

OCTM vs. FBUF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - October (OCTM) and Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF (FBUF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OCTM achieves a 2.71% return, which is significantly lower than FBUF's 5.32% return.

OCTM

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: 0.84%
• YTD: 2.71%
• 6M: 3.16%
• 1Y: 8.16%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FBUF

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: 2.85%
• YTD: 5.32%
• 6M: 6.28%
• 1Y: 19.61%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OCTM vs. FBUF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
OCTM FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - October	2.71%	7.03%	0.33%
FBUF Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF	5.32%	14.01%	1.74%

Correlation

The correlation between OCTM and FBUF is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 22, 2024	0.88

The correlation between OCTM and FBUF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

OCTM vs. FBUF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OCTM

OCTM Risk / Return Rank: 93
OCTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
OCTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
OCTM Omega Ratio Rank: 95
OCTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
OCTM Martin Ratio Rank: 93

FBUF

FBUF Risk / Return Rank: 79
FBUF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
FBUF Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
FBUF Omega Ratio Rank: 86
FBUF Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
FBUF Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OCTM vs. FBUF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - October (OCTM) and Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF (FBUF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	OCTM	FBUF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.38	2.63	+0.75
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	5.34	3.55	+1.78
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.74	1.53	+0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.99	3.51	+1.49
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	24.66	15.68	+8.98
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

OCTM vs. FBUF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OCTM Sharpe Ratio is 3.38, which is comparable to the FBUF Sharpe Ratio of 2.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OCTM and FBUF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	OCTM	FBUF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.38	2.63	+0.75
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.04	1.47	+0.57

Drawdowns

OCTM vs. FBUF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OCTM drawdown since its inception was -3.29%, smaller than the maximum FBUF drawdown of -11.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OCTM and FBUF.

Drawdown Indicators

	OCTM	FBUF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.29%	-11.09%	+7.80%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.64%	-5.61%	+3.97%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.04%	-0.22%	+0.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.39%	-1.38%	+0.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.33%	1.25%	-0.92%

Volatility

OCTM vs. FBUF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - October (OCTM) is 0.46%, while Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF (FBUF) has a volatility of 1.11%. This indicates that OCTM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBUF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	OCTM	FBUF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.46%	1.11%	-0.65%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.82%	5.37%	-3.55%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.43%	7.49%	-5.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.10%	9.55%	-6.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.10%	9.55%	-6.45%

OCTM vs. FBUF - Expense Ratio Comparison

OCTM has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than FBUF's 0.48% expense ratio.

Dividends

OCTM vs. FBUF - Dividend Comparison

OCTM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FBUF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
FBUF Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF	0.63%	0.64%	0.54%
OCTM FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - October	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both OCTM and FBUF in my portfolio?

OCTM and FBUF have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, OCTM or FBUF?

FBUF has higher volatility (1.11%) compared to OCTM (0.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OCTM dropped -3.29% vs FBUF's -11.09%.

Which ETF is better, OCTM or FBUF?

On 1-year performance, FBUF leads with 19.61% vs 8.16% for OCTM. On fees, FBUF is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, OCTM has been the lower-risk option at 0.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, OCTM or FBUF?

Over the 1-year period, FBUF has performed better with a 19.61% return vs 8.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, OCTM or FBUF?

FBUF is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for OCTM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, OCTM or FBUF?

FBUF has the higher dividend yield at 0.63%, compared with 0.00% for OCTM.

What is the main difference between OCTM and FBUF?

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for OCTM and 0.48% for FBUF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

OCTM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.38 vs 2.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.