OCTH vs. HELO
OCTH (Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - October) and HELO (JPMorgan Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF) are both Options Trading funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, OCTH returned 7.08% vs 11.08% for HELO. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. OCTH charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for HELO.
Performance
OCTH vs. HELO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OCTH achieves a 2.88% return, which is significantly higher than HELO's 2.31% return.
OCTH
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- 0.64%
- YTD
- 2.88%
- 6M
- 3.64%
- 1Y
- 7.08%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HELO
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- 0.59%
- YTD
- 2.31%
- 6M
- 2.92%
- 1Y
- 11.08%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OCTH vs. HELO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
OCTH Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - October | 2.88% | 6.58% | 6.24% | 3.79% |
HELO JPMorgan Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF | 2.31% | 7.82% | 18.05% | 6.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between OCTH and HELO is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2023 | 0.71 |
The correlation between OCTH and HELO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.
OCTH vs. HELO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
OCTH
HELO
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
OCTH
HELO
Financial Services
OCTH
HELO
Communication Services
OCTH
HELO
Consumer Cyclical
OCTH
HELO
Healthcare
OCTH
HELO
Industrials
OCTH
HELO
Consumer Defensive
OCTH
HELO
Energy
OCTH
HELO
Utilities
OCTH
HELO
Real Estate
OCTH
HELO
Basic Materials
OCTH
HELO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OCTH vs. HELO — Risk / Return Rank
OCTH
HELO
OCTH vs. HELO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - October (OCTH) and JPMorgan Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HELO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| OCTH | HELO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.91 | 1.79 | +0.12 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.90 | 2.53 | +0.37 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.36 | +0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.11 | 1.93 | +1.18 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.44 | 8.55 | +6.89 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OCTH | HELO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.91 | 1.79 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.23 | 1.64 | -0.41 |
Drawdowns
OCTH vs. HELO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OCTH drawdown since its inception was -7.71%, smaller than the maximum HELO drawdown of -10.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OCTH and HELO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OCTH | HELO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.71% | -10.89% | +3.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.28% | -5.76% | +3.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.21% | -0.28% | +0.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.27% | -1.18% | +0.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.46% | 1.30% | -0.84% |
Volatility
OCTH vs. HELO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - October (OCTH) is 0.38%, while JPMorgan Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HELO) has a volatility of 0.70%. This indicates that OCTH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HELO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OCTH | HELO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.38% | 0.70% | -0.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.88% | 4.99% | -2.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.72% | 6.21% | -2.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.06% | 7.96% | -1.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.06% | 7.96% | -1.90% |
OCTH vs. HELO - Expense Ratio Comparison
OCTH has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than HELO's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
OCTH vs. HELO - Dividend Comparison
OCTH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.31%, more than HELO's 0.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
HELO JPMorgan Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF | 0.62% | 0.67% | 0.60% | 0.19% |
OCTH Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - October | 6.31% | 6.33% | 7.43% | 1.93% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OCTH and HELO have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HELO has higher volatility (0.70%) compared to OCTH (0.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OCTH dropped -7.71% vs HELO's -10.89%.
On 1-year performance, HELO leads with 11.08% vs 7.08% for OCTH. On fees, HELO is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, OCTH has been the lower-risk option at 0.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, HELO has performed better with a 11.08% return vs 7.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HELO is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for OCTH.
OCTH has the higher dividend yield at 6.31%, compared with 0.62% for HELO.
They also come from different issuers: Innovator and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for OCTH and 0.50% for HELO.
OCTH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OCTH and HELO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer