PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OCTH vs. APRJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OCTH vs. APRJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - October (OCTH) and Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - April (APRJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OCTH achieves a 2.88% return, which is significantly lower than APRJ's 3.18% return.


OCTH

1D
-0.21%
1M
0.64%
YTD
2.88%
6M
3.64%
1Y
7.08%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

APRJ

1D
-0.10%
1M
0.70%
YTD
3.18%
6M
3.64%
1Y
6.91%
3Y*
6.35%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OCTH vs. APRJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
OCTH
Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - October
2.88%6.58%6.24%3.79%
APRJ
Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - April
3.18%5.71%6.24%1.73%

Correlation

The correlation between OCTH and APRJ is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2023

0.48

OCTH vs. APRJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
OCTH
APRJ

Technology

33.6%
33.6%

Financial Services

12.4%
12.4%

Communication Services

10.5%
10.5%

Consumer Cyclical

10.0%
10.0%

Healthcare

9.5%
9.5%

Industrials

8.5%
8.5%

Consumer Defensive

5.3%
5.3%

Energy

4.0%
4.0%

Utilities

2.5%
2.5%

Real Estate

2.0%
2.0%

Basic Materials

1.9%
1.9%

Technology

OCTH
33.6%
APRJ
33.6%

Financial Services

OCTH
12.4%
APRJ
12.4%

Communication Services

OCTH
10.5%
APRJ
10.5%

Consumer Cyclical

OCTH
10.0%
APRJ
10.0%

Healthcare

OCTH
9.5%
APRJ
9.5%

Industrials

OCTH
8.5%
APRJ
8.5%

Consumer Defensive

OCTH
5.3%
APRJ
5.3%

Energy

OCTH
4.0%
APRJ
4.0%

Utilities

OCTH
2.5%
APRJ
2.5%

Real Estate

OCTH
2.0%
APRJ
2.0%

Basic Materials

OCTH
1.9%
APRJ
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OCTH vs. APRJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OCTH
OCTH Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
OCTH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OCTH Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
OCTH Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
OCTH Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
OCTH Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

APRJ
APRJ Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
APRJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APRJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
APRJ Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
APRJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
APRJ Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OCTH vs. APRJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - October (OCTH) and Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - April (APRJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


OCTHAPRJDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.91

4.63

-2.71

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.90

9.47

-6.57

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

2.20

-0.78

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.11

34.55

-31.44

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.44

103.47

-88.02

OCTH vs. APRJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OCTH Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is lower than the APRJ Sharpe Ratio of 4.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OCTH and APRJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


OCTHAPRJDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.91

4.63

-2.71

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.23

1.80

-0.58

Drawdowns

OCTH vs. APRJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OCTH drawdown since its inception was -7.71%, which is greater than APRJ's maximum drawdown of -4.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OCTH and APRJ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OCTHAPRJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.71%

-4.68%

-3.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.28%

-0.20%

-2.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.21%

-0.12%

-0.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.27%

-0.12%

-0.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.46%

0.07%

+0.39%

Volatility

OCTH vs. APRJ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - October (OCTH) is 0.38%, while Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - April (APRJ) has a volatility of 0.47%. This indicates that OCTH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than APRJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OCTHAPRJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.38%

0.47%

-0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.88%

1.14%

+1.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.72%

1.50%

+2.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.06%

3.63%

+2.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.06%

3.63%

+2.43%

OCTH vs. APRJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both OCTH and APRJ have an expense ratio of 0.79%.


Dividends

OCTH vs. APRJ - Dividend Comparison

OCTH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.31%, more than APRJ's 5.27% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
APRJ
Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - April
5.27%5.46%5.88%4.88%
OCTH
Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - October
6.31%6.33%7.43%1.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


OCTH and APRJ have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

APRJ has higher volatility (0.47%) compared to OCTH (0.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OCTH dropped -7.71% vs APRJ's -4.68%.

On 1-year performance, OCTH leads with 7.08% vs 6.91% for APRJ. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, OCTH has performed better with a 7.08% return vs 6.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

OCTH and APRJ have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.

OCTH has the higher dividend yield at 6.31%, compared with 5.27% for APRJ.

APRJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.63 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OCTH and APRJ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer