OBTC vs. SETH
OBTC (Osprey Bitcoin Trust) and SETH (ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds - OBTC tracks the Bitcoin (BTC) while SETH tracks the Bloomberg Galaxy Ethereum (--100%). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, OBTC returned -32.02% vs 7.07% for SETH. At a correlation of -0.75, they often move in opposite directions. OBTC charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for SETH.
Performance
OBTC vs. SETH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OBTC achieves a -31.16% return, which is significantly lower than SETH's 59.02% return.
OBTC
- 1D
- -5.16%
- 1M
- -26.03%
- YTD
- -31.16%
- 6M
- -29.55%
- 1Y
- -32.02%
- 3Y*
- 55.06%
- 5Y*
- 6.73%
- 10Y*
- —
SETH
- 1D
- 11.12%
- 1M
- 45.89%
- YTD
- 59.02%
- 6M
- 59.29%
- 1Y
- 7.07%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OBTC vs. SETH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
OBTC Osprey Bitcoin Trust | -31.16% | -1.87% | 130.89% | 33.92% |
SETH ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF | 59.02% | -29.41% | -49.59% | -22.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between OBTC and SETH is -0.83, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2023 | -0.75 |
The correlation between OBTC and SETH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.83 to -0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OBTC vs. SETH — Risk / Return Rank
OBTC
SETH
OBTC vs. SETH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Osprey Bitcoin Trust (OBTC) and ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF (SETH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| OBTC | SETH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.82 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 1.08 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.67 | 0.13 | -0.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.26 | 0.20 | -1.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OBTC | SETH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.72 | 0.10 | -0.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.23 | -0.39 | +0.17 |
Drawdowns
OBTC vs. SETH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OBTC drawdown since its inception was -94.50%, which is greater than SETH's maximum drawdown of -80.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OBTC and SETH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OBTC | SETH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.50% | -80.74% | -13.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -48.14% | -56.01% | +7.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -48.14% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -83.76% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -65.62% | -56.32% | -9.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -69.62% | -54.80% | -14.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 25.40% | 35.78% | -10.38% |
Volatility
OBTC vs. SETH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Osprey Bitcoin Trust (OBTC) is 9.93%, while ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF (SETH) has a volatility of 13.29%. This indicates that OBTC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SETH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OBTC | SETH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.93% | 13.29% | -3.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.48% | 46.06% | -11.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.58% | 69.34% | -24.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 58.14% | 69.78% | -11.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 71.55% | 69.78% | +1.77% |
OBTC vs. SETH - Expense Ratio Comparison
OBTC has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than SETH's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
OBTC vs. SETH - Dividend Comparison
OBTC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SETH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.67%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
OBTC Osprey Bitcoin Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SETH ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF | 9.67% | 7.01% | 3.44% | 0.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OBTC and SETH have a correlation of -0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SETH has higher volatility (13.29%) compared to OBTC (9.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OBTC dropped -94.50% vs SETH's -80.74%.
On 1-year performance, SETH leads with 7.07% vs -32.02% for OBTC. On fees, OBTC is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, OBTC has been the lower-risk option at 9.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SETH has performed better with a 7.07% return vs -32.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
OBTC is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SETH.
SETH has the higher dividend yield at 9.67%, compared with 0.00% for OBTC.
OBTC tracks Bitcoin (BTC), while SETH tracks Bloomberg Galaxy Ethereum (--100%). They also come from different issuers: Osprey Funds and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for OBTC and 0.95% for SETH.
SETH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.10 vs -0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OBTC and SETH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer